The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, outlines the requirements for food labeling. Section ATCP 100.10 addresses the declaration of ingredients. For a food product containing multiple forms of the same ingredient, such as sweeteners, the law requires that the ingredients be listed in descending order of predominance by weight. If a manufacturer uses both granulated sugar and high-fructose corn syrup as sweeteners in a cookie recipe, and the total weight of granulated sugar is greater than the total weight of high-fructose corn syrup, then granulated sugar must be listed before high-fructose corn syrup. If, however, the combined weight of both sweeteners is less than the weight of another ingredient, such as flour, then both sweeteners would be listed after the flour. The regulation emphasizes the accurate and informative representation of product composition to consumers, enabling them to make informed purchasing decisions based on the ingredients present and their relative quantities. This principle extends to all ingredients, ensuring transparency in food product formulation.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, specifically under Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 97, governs the adulteration and misbranding of food. Section 97.12 addresses the prohibition of adulterated food. Adulteration occurs if a food contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health. It also occurs if a food has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. Furthermore, if a food consists in whole or in part of any diseased or decomposed substance, or if it has been produced, prepared, packed, or held under conditions that would result in the presence of insect or animal filth, it is considered adulterated. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) is responsible for enforcing these provisions. A food product that contains visible insect fragments, even if not proven to be immediately injurious to health, would be considered adulterated under the statute due to the presence of filth and potential contamination. This is a strict liability offense, meaning intent or knowledge of the contamination is not a defense. The focus is on the condition of the food itself and whether it violates the statutory definitions of adulteration.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.15 addresses the requirement for net quantity of contents to be declared on the principal display panel. This declaration must be in terms of weight, measure, or count, and must be accompanied by a statement of the identity of the commodity. For foods sold by weight, the net weight must be expressed in pounds and ounces. The principal display panel is defined as that part of the package most likely to be displayed, presented, or examined by the consumer. In this scenario, the front of the cereal box is the principal display panel. Therefore, the net weight declaration must be present on this panel. The question tests the understanding of where the net quantity of contents should be placed on food packaging according to Wisconsin regulations, emphasizing the importance of the principal display panel.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, outlines requirements for the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.15 addresses the declaration of net quantity of contents. This regulation mandates that the net quantity of contents be expressed in terms of weight, measure, or count. For packaged goods, the net weight must be declared in both avoirdupois pound and ounce, or in fluid ounces. The placement and prominence of this declaration are also specified. Specifically, the net quantity statement must be placed on the principal display panel of the package. The font size and clarity of the statement are regulated to ensure it is easily readable by the consumer. Failure to comply with these labeling requirements can result in enforcement actions by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP). The intent of these regulations is to provide consumers with accurate and understandable information about the amount of food they are purchasing, preventing deceptive practices and ensuring fair competition among food producers. This facilitates informed purchasing decisions by consumers in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically under Chapter ATCP 138, addresses the labeling of prepackaged food. This regulation aims to ensure consumers receive accurate and complete information about the food they purchase. When a food product is misbranded, it can lead to consumer deception and potential health risks. Misbranding can occur in various ways, including inaccurate ingredient lists, misleading nutritional information, or failure to declare allergens. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) is the primary state agency responsible for enforcing these regulations. A food product is considered misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular. This includes representations made or implied by design or ornamentation. For instance, if a product is labeled as “all natural” but contains artificial flavoring, it would be considered misbranded. Similarly, if a food product fails to list a major allergen, such as peanuts, in accordance with federal and state requirements, it is misbranded. The consequence of misbranding is that the product can be seized, condemned, and destroyed, or the responsible party can face penalties. The specific focus here is on the labeling aspect of misbranding.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 137, outlines regulations concerning the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 137.22, titled “False or Misleading Representations,” prohibits any statement, design, or device that is false or misleading in any particular. This includes representations regarding the composition, quality, or origin of a food. When a food product is labeled as “Made with Real Wisconsin Cheese” but the primary cheese ingredient is sourced from Minnesota, this constitutes a misleading representation about the origin of a key component, thereby violating the spirit and letter of ATCP 137.22. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) would likely consider this a deceptive practice. Therefore, the most appropriate action for DATCP to take, based on the Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, is to issue a stop sale order for the mislabeled product to prevent further distribution and consumer deception. A stop sale order is a common enforcement tool used to halt the sale of products that do not comply with state laws and regulations.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code (WFDC) Chapter ATCP 130 outlines specific requirements for food labeling. Section ATCP 130.11, which addresses the declaration of ingredients, mandates that ingredients must be listed in descending order by weight. This principle is fundamental to providing consumers with accurate information about the composition of food products. When a food contains multiple ingredients, the one present in the largest quantity by weight must be declared first, followed by the next largest, and so on, until the ingredient present in the smallest quantity. This ensures transparency and allows consumers to make informed purchasing decisions based on the relative proportions of components. For instance, if a cookie recipe uses flour as the primary ingredient, followed by sugar, and then butter, the ingredient list would begin with “flour,” followed by “sugar,” and then “butter,” assuming these are the top three ingredients by weight. This systematic declaration prevents misleading consumers about the primary components of a food product.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 138, outlines the requirements for food labeling. For a food product to be considered “low sodium,” it must contain no more than 140 milligrams (mg) of sodium per serving. This threshold is a critical regulatory standard established by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) to inform consumers about the sodium content of their food. The determination of whether a product meets this claim is based on the product’s declared sodium content per serving as presented on its nutrition facts label, adhering to federal guidelines that Wisconsin often aligns with for consistency. Understanding this specific numerical limit is essential for food manufacturers operating within Wisconsin and for regulatory compliance officers assessing product labeling accuracy. This standard ensures that consumers seeking to manage their sodium intake have reliable information to make informed dietary choices.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products sold within the state. This regulation aligns with federal standards but also includes specific Wisconsin requirements. For a food product to be considered “low sodium” in Wisconsin, it must meet the criteria established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for such claims, which are then adopted by the state. The FDA defines “low sodium” as containing no more than 35 milligrams (mg) of sodium per serving, or if the serving size is 30 grams or less, or about 2 tablespoons, no more than 35 mg per 50 grams. Furthermore, for a “very low sodium” claim, the food must contain no more than 5 mg of sodium per serving. The regulation also addresses “reduced sodium” claims, which require at least a 25% reduction in sodium compared to a comparable food. In this scenario, the “Garden Delight Vegetable Medley” contains 30 mg of sodium per serving. This amount falls within the FDA’s definition of “low sodium” (≤ 35 mg per serving) and therefore also complies with Wisconsin’s labeling requirements for this claim. Other claims like “reduced sodium” would require a comparison to a reference food, and “very low sodium” has a stricter threshold.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 97, Food Regulation, specifically addresses the adulteration of food. Section 97.02 defines adulterated food broadly, including if it “consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid or decomposed substance or of any animal, human or vegetable substance which has not been inspected and passed, or if it is otherwise unfit for food.” Furthermore, § 97.03 outlines the powers of the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) to condemn and seize adulterated food. The core principle is that food must be wholesome and free from contamination that would render it injurious to health. In the scenario presented, the presence of rodent excreta, even if removed prior to sale, indicates a violation of the standard of wholesomeness and freedom from filth. The act of having the food in possession, regardless of subsequent cleaning, demonstrates that the food was adulterated at a point in time while under the control of the establishment, thus falling under the purview of the Wisconsin Food Code and related statutes. The DATCP has the authority to take action against such food products to protect public health.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, addresses the labeling requirements for food products. Section ATCP 100.03(1)(a) outlines the general principle that food labeling must not be false or misleading. This includes not only direct misrepresentations but also implications created by the overall presentation of the food. When a food product is marketed with a specific ingredient prominently displayed on its principal display panel, such as “Strawberry Delight” with a large image of strawberries, but the actual strawberry content is minimal and primarily derived from artificial flavoring, this constitutes a misleading representation. The Wisconsin Administrative Code mandates that such labeling must accurately reflect the composition of the food to prevent consumer deception. Therefore, the presence of artificial flavoring as the primary source of the “strawberry” characteristic, without clear disclosure of the limited or absent natural strawberry content, violates the principle of truthful and not misleading labeling under Wisconsin law. The focus is on the overall impression conveyed to the consumer and whether that impression aligns with the actual product composition.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.09 addresses the requirement for nutritional information on food labels. For a food product that is sold directly to consumers and is not a single-serving item, the label must bear a nutritional information statement unless an exemption applies. One such exemption, outlined in ATCP 100.09(2)(a)3, is for foods that contain insignificant amounts of all the required nutrients listed in the standard nutritional labeling format. This includes foods that do not contain any fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, carbohydrates, protein, or vitamins and minerals in amounts that can be declared as significant. Therefore, a food product that meets these criteria for insignificant nutrient content would be exempt from bearing a full nutritional facts panel. The question asks about a food product sold directly to consumers in Wisconsin that is not a single-serving item. If this product’s formulation results in negligible amounts of all standard declared nutrients, it falls under the exemption for foods with insignificant nutritional content.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 130, governs the sale of food and dairy products. This regulation outlines requirements for preventing the adulteration and misbranding of food. Adulteration can occur through various means, including the presence of poisonous or deleterious substances, unsanitary conditions, or the addition of substances that reduce its quality or strength. Misbranding, on the other hand, pertains to false or misleading labeling. When a food product is found to be adulterated or misbranded, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) has the authority to take enforcement actions. These actions can include issuing stop sale orders, seizing the product, and initiating legal proceedings. The primary objective of these regulations and enforcement powers is to protect public health and ensure fair competition in the food marketplace by maintaining the integrity and safety of food products offered for sale within Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Wis. Stat. § 97.02, grants broad authority to the department to enact rules necessary to prevent the adulteration, misbranding, or false advertising of food. Therefore, a product that is adulterated due to unsanitary processing conditions, as described, falls directly under the purview of these enforcement provisions.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically under Chapter ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.12 addresses the net quantity of contents. This regulation mandates that the net quantity of food sold in packages must be stated in terms of weight, measure, or count. The primary declaration of net quantity must appear on the principal display panel of the package. For packages weighing one pound or less, the net quantity must be expressed in ounces (avoirdupois) and, if the weight is less than 4 ounces, it may also be expressed in fluid ounces if it is a liquid. For packages weighing more than one pound, the net quantity must be expressed in pounds, or in pounds and ounces. The regulation also specifies the location and prominence of this declaration. The question asks about a scenario where a Wisconsin retailer is selling a package of artisanal cheese. The cheese is labeled with its weight in grams, but not in ounces or pounds, and the declaration is placed on the back of the package, not the principal display panel. This violates Wisconsin’s net quantity labeling requirements, which prioritize the use of U.S. customary units (ounces, pounds) and require the primary declaration on the principal display panel. Therefore, the retailer would be in violation of Wisconsin food labeling laws.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 131, outlines requirements for food labeling. Section ATCP 131.04 addresses the labeling of imitation foods. An imitation food is defined as a food that is a substitute for another food, resembles another food, and is made from different ingredients. The code mandates that if a food is an imitation, its label must clearly and conspicuously bear the word “imitation” along with the name of the food imitated. For instance, if a product is made to resemble butter but uses vegetable oil and other ingredients not found in butter, it must be labeled as “imitation butter.” This requirement aims to prevent consumer deception by ensuring that consumers are fully aware when a product is not the genuine article it purports to be, allowing them to make informed purchasing decisions based on the actual composition and characteristics of the food. The intent is to protect consumers from misleading marketing and to ensure fair competition among food producers.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically ATCP 100.20, outlines the requirements for food labeling. This regulation mandates that food labels must be truthful and not misleading. When a food product is advertised as “natural,” it implies that the product has not been significantly altered by processing or the addition of artificial ingredients. Wisconsin law, mirroring federal guidance in the absence of specific state definitions, generally interprets “natural” to mean that the product contains no artificial flavors, colors, or synthetic ingredients, and is minimally processed. Therefore, a product containing high-fructose corn syrup, a highly processed sweetener derived from corn through enzymatic and chemical processes, would likely be considered misleading if labeled as “natural” under Wisconsin’s food labeling standards. This interpretation focuses on the degree of processing and the presence of synthetic or artificial components, which are contrary to the common understanding and regulatory intent of the term “natural” in food labeling.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 138, governs the sale of shell eggs in the state. This regulation mandates that shell eggs sold at retail must be stored at or below a specific temperature to maintain quality and prevent bacterial growth. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) enforces these standards. The critical temperature for refrigerated shell eggs is 45 degrees Fahrenheit (7 degrees Celsius). This temperature is established to inhibit the proliferation of pathogens like Salmonella, which can be present in eggs. While the federal Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) also sets standards for egg safety, Wisconsin’s state-specific regulations, like ATCP 138, detail the precise storage requirements for retail sales within the state. Therefore, maintaining egg storage at or below 45°F is a direct requirement under Wisconsin law for retail establishments.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 137, outlines requirements for food labeling. This chapter, mirroring federal regulations under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), mandates that food labeling must not be false or misleading. When a food product is adulterated or misbranded, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) can take enforcement action. Misbranding occurs when the labeling is deceptive regarding the product’s identity, ingredients, or nutritional information, or if it fails to comply with specific labeling requirements for certain food categories. For instance, if a cheese product marketed as “aged Wisconsin cheddar” contains less than the legally defined minimum aging period for cheddar or is not produced in Wisconsin according to specific standards, it would be considered misbranded. The Wisconsin DATCP has the authority to seize such products, issue stop sale orders, and impose penalties. The core principle is that the label must accurately represent the product to the consumer.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.07 addresses the requirements for nutrient declarations, commonly known as the Nutrition Facts panel. This section mandates that if a nutrient is declared voluntarily on a food label, and that nutrient is one of the mandatory nutrients listed in 21 CFR 101.36 (which Wisconsin often adopts by reference or aligns with), then the declaration must follow the format and content requirements of federal regulations. For a product making a claim about vitamin D content, and vitamin D is a mandatory nutrient for nutrition labeling, the label must provide the amount of vitamin D in milligrams (mg) or micrograms (mcg) and the percentage of the Daily Value (%DV) based on a 2,000 calorie diet, unless specific exemptions apply. The format requires the term “Vitamin D” followed by the amount and then “% DV”. Therefore, a label stating “Vitamin D 10 mcg (20% DV)” accurately reflects the required format for a voluntary declaration of vitamin D, assuming the 10 mcg corresponds to 20% of the established Daily Value for vitamin D. The Wisconsin Administrative Code, particularly ATCP 100, emphasizes compliance with federal standards for nutrition labeling when such declarations are made.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.16 outlines the requirements for net quantity of contents. This regulation mandates that the net quantity be expressed in both avoirdupois pound and ounce, and also in metric units. For containers with a net weight of one pound or less, the quantity must be expressed in ounces, and for containers over one pound, it must be expressed in pounds and ounces. The question presents a scenario where a Wisconsin food producer is labeling a jar of artisanal preserves. The net weight of the preserves is 12 ounces. According to ATCP 100.16, for a net weight of one pound or less, the quantity must be expressed in ounces. Therefore, 12 ounces is the correct expression in avoirdupois units. The metric equivalent for 12 ounces is approximately 340 grams. The regulation requires both. The scenario describes the product being sold in Wisconsin, making Wisconsin’s specific regulations applicable.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, addresses the labeling of food products to prevent consumer deception. When a food product is sold in Wisconsin and its labeling includes a statement about the origin of a significant ingredient, such as “Made with Wisconsin Cheddar,” this statement is considered a claim that must be substantiated. Wisconsin Administrative Code ATCP 100.10(1) requires that all labeling be truthful and not misleading. Furthermore, ATCP 100.10(3) specifically prohibits misbranding, which includes false or misleading statements about the origin of a food or its ingredients. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) enforces these regulations. A product labeled as “Made with Wisconsin Cheddar” implies that the cheddar cheese used in its production originates from Wisconsin. If the cheddar cheese is sourced from outside Wisconsin, this labeling would be considered misleading under ATCP 100.10(3), constituting misbranding. Therefore, the most accurate description of the regulatory implication is that the labeling would be considered misbranded.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 131, outlines requirements for the labeling of food products. For canned goods, the code mandates that the label clearly state the name of the food, the net quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count, and the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor. Furthermore, for canned goods, the law requires a statement of the quality of the food, such as “Grade A” or “U.S. Fancy,” if a standard of quality has been promulgated by the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and the food purports to meet that standard. The question concerns a specific product, “Wisconsin Cheddar Cheese Curds,” which are a dairy product, and the regulations governing their labeling. While general food labeling requirements apply, specific dairy product regulations under Wisconsin law and federal standards, if applicable, must also be considered. The scenario describes a product that has been processed and packaged, implying it falls under the purview of food safety and labeling regulations. The absence of a statement of quality, such as “Premium” or “Artisan,” on a product that could potentially meet certain quality standards, and the presence of the manufacturer’s name, net weight, and ingredient list, are key factors. Wisconsin Administrative Code ATCP 131.04(1) and (2) govern general food labeling, requiring accurate and informative labeling. ATCP 131.05(1) addresses standards of identity and quality. While cheese curds themselves may not always have a formal USDA “grade” like canned peaches, if the manufacturer makes a claim about quality, it must be substantiated. However, the question implies a general labeling scenario without specific quality claims being made. Therefore, the most critical missing element, if a standard of quality were being represented, would be the quality grade. In the absence of any specific quality claim, the primary concern is the accuracy and completeness of the mandatory information. The question asks what is *most* important to add to ensure compliance with Wisconsin Food and Drug Law, given the existing information. The existing information includes the product name, net weight, and ingredient list. The crucial element missing, particularly for a product that might be subject to quality grading or where a quality assertion is implied by its presentation, is a statement of quality. If the product is intended to meet a specific recognized quality standard, this must be declared. Without such a declaration, the labeling is incomplete if a quality standard is implied or expected.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, outlines requirements for the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.18 addresses the net quantity of contents. This regulation mandates that the net quantity of food in a package must be stated in terms of weight, measure, or count. When a statement of net quantity is required, it must be prominently displayed on the principal display panel. The specific units of measure are also prescribed, with weight generally required in avoirdupois pounds and ounces, and liquid measure in U.S. customary units (gallons, quarts, pints, cups, fluid ounces). For dry commodities, volume may be used if the commodity is customarily sold by volume. The placement and prominence of this information are crucial to ensure consumers are not misled. The intent is to provide clear and accurate information regarding the amount of product they are purchasing. Therefore, a food product sold in Wisconsin must clearly state its net quantity of contents on its principal display panel using appropriate units as defined by the code.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically under Chapter ATCP 100, addresses the adulteration of food. Section ATCP 100.03 outlines conditions under which a food is considered adulterated. One key provision relates to the presence of poisonous or deleterious substances. If a food contains any added poisonous or deleterious substance that may render it injurious to health, it is deemed adulterated. This includes substances that are not naturally present in the food and are added during processing or packaging. The presence of such a substance, even if not immediately causing illness, makes the food adulterated if it has the potential to cause harm. Therefore, a food product containing even a small, measurable amount of a chemical known to be harmful if ingested, regardless of the dosage consumed, is considered adulterated under Wisconsin law due to the potential for injury. The focus is on the presence of the harmful substance and its potential to render the food injurious, not on proving actual harm occurred in a specific instance.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.04 outlines the requirements for net quantity of contents. This regulation mandates that the net quantity of contents be expressed in terms of weight, measure, or count. For most foods sold by weight, the net weight must be declared in pounds, ounces, or both. For foods sold by fluid measure, the declaration must be in gallons, quarts, pints, or fluid ounces. Wisconsin law, like federal law, generally requires the net quantity statement to be placed on the principal display panel of the food package. The specific placement and format of this declaration are detailed to ensure consumer clarity. The code also addresses variations for different types of packaging and commodities, ensuring that the declaration is both accurate and conspicuous. Therefore, for a package of artisanal cheese sold by weight in Wisconsin, the net quantity statement must accurately reflect its weight, typically in pounds and ounces, placed prominently on the packaging.

Wisconsin Statute 97.12 outlines the requirements for food labeling. Specifically, it addresses the prohibition of misbranding and adulteration. Misbranding occurs when a food’s labeling is false or misleading in any particular. This includes deceptive packaging, incorrect weight or measure declarations, and the omission of required information. Adulteration, on the other hand, pertains to the physical condition of the food itself, such as the presence of poisonous or deleterious substances, or if it has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions. The scenario describes a product where the ingredient list is incomplete, failing to disclose a known allergen. This omission directly contravenes the principle of accurate and complete labeling, rendering the product misbranded under Wisconsin law, regardless of whether the food itself is physically adulterated. The law mandates that labels must provide truthful and sufficient information to prevent consumer deception. The absence of a critical ingredient, particularly an allergen, constitutes a material omission that misleads consumers about the product’s composition and potential health risks. Therefore, the primary violation is misbranding due to a false or misleading label.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 137, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 137.11 outlines the requirements for nutrient declarations. For a food product that is not a raw agricultural commodity and is not a food for which a standard of identity has been promulgated under federal law or Wisconsin law, and it is fortified with vitamins or minerals, the label must declare the presence and amount of these added nutrients. The law requires that the declaration of vitamins and minerals be in accordance with federal regulations, which are found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21, Part 101. This includes the requirement for a Nutrition Facts panel when applicable, and specific declarations for added vitamins and minerals, often expressed per serving. The question implies a situation where a food product is intentionally enhanced with specific vitamins and minerals, necessitating a clear and compliant labeling strategy to inform consumers about these additions, as mandated by Wisconsin’s food labeling regulations which align with federal standards for such fortification. The core principle is transparency regarding added nutritional content.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, outlines requirements for food labeling. For a food product intended for retail sale, the label must include a statement of the net quantity of contents. This statement must be in terms of weight, measure, or count, and must be prominently displayed on the principal display panel. The net quantity must be expressed in both metric and U.S. customary units. For a product packaged in a container where the quantity is typically expressed by volume, such as liquids, the net quantity of contents must be stated in terms of fluid ounces and milliliters. For a product where the quantity is typically expressed by weight, such as solid foods, it must be stated in terms of avoirdupois ounces and grams. The specific placement and font size of the net quantity statement are also regulated to ensure it is easily readable by consumers. The question asks about the requirement for a packaged cheese product, which is typically sold by weight. Therefore, the net quantity must be expressed in avoirdupois ounces and grams. The calculation of the exact numerical value of the net quantity is not required for this question, but understanding the unit of measure is crucial. The explanation focuses on the regulatory basis for the labeling requirement under Wisconsin law, emphasizing the dual unit expression for net quantity of contents for weight-based products. This aligns with federal regulations under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, which Wisconsin law generally mirrors for consistency.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically Chapter ATCP 100, outlines requirements for food labeling. Section ATCP 100.04 addresses the labeling of imitation foods. An imitation food is defined as a food that is a substitute for another food, resembles another food in appearance, odor, taste, and color, and is made from different ingredients. The key aspect is that it is not nutritionally inferior to the food it imitates, and its labeling must clearly indicate it is an imitation and identify the food it imitates. For example, a product made from vegetable oil that mimics butter would need to be labeled as an imitation butter, specifying its primary ingredients. This ensures consumers are not misled about the composition and nutritional value of the product they are purchasing. The regulation aims to prevent deceptive practices and provide transparency in the marketplace, allowing consumers to make informed choices based on accurate product information. Wisconsin law, in line with federal principles under the FDCA, emphasizes truthful and informative labeling to protect public health and prevent consumer fraud.

The Wisconsin Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Code, specifically ATCP 100, governs the labeling of food products. Section ATCP 100.03 outlines the requirements for net quantity of contents. When a food product is sold in a container that is not a standard container size, the net quantity must be expressed in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count. For commodities sold by weight, the net weight must be declared in pounds and ounces, or in pounds, or in ounces. For commodities sold by fluid measure, the net fluid measure must be declared in gallons, quarts, pints, or fluid ounces. For commodities sold by linear measure, the net linear measure must be declared in yards, feet, or inches. In this scenario, the artisanal cheese is sold by weight. Wisconsin law, mirroring federal regulations under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, requires the net quantity to be clearly and conspicuously displayed on the principal display panel. The declaration must be in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count. For cheese, weight is the standard. The net weight declaration must be in both the U.S. customary system and, if applicable, the metric system, though the question implies a focus on the U.S. customary system for this specific context. The declaration must be in terms of pounds, ounces, or a combination thereof. The phrase “net weight 16 oz” accurately reflects a valid declaration of net quantity for a food product sold by weight under Wisconsin’s food labeling regulations, representing one pound of product.