The Wisconsin Aeronautics Commission, established under Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, is tasked with the development and promotion of aviation within the state. This commission plays a crucial role in establishing airport standards, administering state aeronautics funds, and ensuring compliance with federal and state aviation regulations. A key aspect of their authority involves the regulation of airport licensing and the establishment of minimum safety and operational standards for public airports. When an airport proposes to alter its runway configuration, particularly by extending a runway, it directly impacts the airspace around the airport and the safety of aircraft operations. Wisconsin law, through the Wisconsin Aeronautics Commission, requires that any such significant alteration to a licensed airport’s facilities, including runway extensions, must be reviewed and approved by the commission. This review process ensures that the proposed changes meet established safety standards, zoning requirements, and are compatible with the surrounding land use and air traffic patterns. Failure to obtain this approval can lead to penalties and the revocation of an airport’s license. Therefore, the commission’s oversight is essential for maintaining a safe and efficient aviation system in Wisconsin.

The scenario involves an aircraft operating within Wisconsin’s airspace and the applicable regulations governing its operation. Wisconsin Statute 114.05 specifically addresses the registration of aircraft. It mandates that any aircraft owned by a resident of Wisconsin, or based within the state for more than 30 consecutive days, must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. This registration is a prerequisite for legal operation within the state’s jurisdiction. The statute aims to ensure accountability, safety, and proper identification of aircraft operating within Wisconsin. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can lead to penalties, including fines and potential impoundment of the aircraft. Therefore, for an aircraft that has been continuously based in Wisconsin for 45 days and is owned by a Wisconsin resident, registration is a mandatory legal obligation under Wisconsin aviation law.

The scenario presented concerns the operation of an aircraft without proper certification for carrying passengers for hire within Wisconsin. Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 304, “Aircraft,” and specifically relevant sections pertaining to air carrier operations and pilot licensing, would govern such an activity. While the question does not require a calculation, it tests the understanding of regulatory frameworks. Operating an aircraft for compensation without the necessary certifications, such as an air carrier certificate or appropriate pilot endorsements, constitutes a violation of aviation law. This is because such operations are subject to stringent safety and operational standards designed to protect the public. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) or the Wisconsin State Patrol Aviation Section would be responsible for enforcing these regulations. Penalties for such violations can include fines, suspension or revocation of pilot certificates or aircraft registrations, and potentially other legal sanctions. The core principle being tested is the requirement for regulatory compliance in commercial aviation activities, even at a local or state level, ensuring that all operations meet established safety benchmarks. This includes ensuring the aircraft is properly maintained, the pilot is qualified for the specific type of operation, and the operator has obtained the necessary operating authority from the state. The absence of a Part 135 certificate (Federal Aviation Regulation) is not directly tested here, but the principle of needing state-level authorization for hire operations is paramount.

Wisconsin Statute §114.10 governs the registration of aircraft in the state. This statute requires that any aircraft owned or operated within Wisconsin and not registered under the laws of the United States or any other state must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The registration process involves submitting an application detailing the aircraft’s make, model, serial number, and ownership information, along with a fee. The primary purpose of this registration is to provide a clear record of aircraft operating within the state for regulatory and safety purposes, and to facilitate the collection of any applicable state-level aviation taxes or fees. Failure to comply with these registration requirements can result in penalties, including fines. The statute also specifies that aircraft registered in another state or under federal authority are generally exempt from Wisconsin’s specific registration requirements when operating within the state, provided they are in compliance with their originating registration. This ensures that aircraft engaged in interstate commerce or transient operations are not unduly burdened by duplicative registration mandates.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, concerning Aeronautics, outlines the framework for aviation within the state. Specifically, Section 114.09 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Wisconsin for more than 30 consecutive days must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The purpose of this registration is to ensure accountability, facilitate enforcement of aviation laws, and potentially for taxation purposes. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can result in penalties, including fines. The statute does not differentiate based on the type of operation (e.g., private, commercial) for the initial registration requirement if the aircraft is based in the state for the specified period. The key factor is the situs of the aircraft for the duration of its presence. Therefore, an aircraft based in Wisconsin for 45 days, regardless of its ownership or operational status, is subject to the registration requirement under Wisconsin law.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning aeronautics, outlines the framework for airport development and operation within the state. Section 114.065 addresses the acquisition of land for airport purposes, including the ability to condemn property for airport expansion or establishment. This power of eminent domain, when exercised by a municipality or other authorized entity for public use, is a fundamental aspect of aviation infrastructure development. The statute grants the authority to acquire by purchase, gift, or condemnation, any property necessary for the creation or improvement of airports. The process of condemnation involves specific legal procedures to ensure fair compensation to the property owner, as mandated by both state and federal constitutional provisions. Understanding the scope of this authority and the procedural safeguards is crucial for any entity involved in airport development in Wisconsin. The question focuses on the legal basis for a municipality to acquire land for a public airport, which is directly addressed by the eminent domain provisions within the Wisconsin Statutes.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aviation law in the state. Specifically, the section pertaining to airport zoning and land use around airports is crucial for ensuring safety and preventing obstructions. Airport zoning ordinances are designed to protect the navigable airspace and to prevent hazards to air navigation. These ordinances typically establish height restrictions for structures, define prohibited areas, and regulate land use within specified zones surrounding an airport. The primary goal is to maintain clear flight paths and minimize the risk of collisions with terrain or man-made objects. When a proposed development near an airport, such as a new agricultural silo in Wisconsin, is being considered, it must be evaluated against these established zoning regulations. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation, through its Bureau of Aeronautics, plays a role in overseeing airport protection zones and can provide guidance or require modifications to ensure compliance with state and federal standards, which often align with FAA guidelines for airport safety. The determination of whether a structure like a silo can be permitted involves assessing its height relative to the approach and departure surfaces defined by the airport’s master plan and relevant zoning ordinances. The concept of “navigable airspace” as defined in aviation law is central to this assessment, ensuring that the airspace necessary for safe aircraft operations remains unobstructed.

Wisconsin Statute § 114.065 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires that any aircraft operated within Wisconsin, or based in Wisconsin, must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The registration process involves submitting an application along with a fee. The purpose of this registration is to provide a means of identification and to ensure compliance with aviation regulations within the state. Failure to register an aircraft as required can result in penalties, including fines. The statute specifies that registration is an annual requirement. The fee structure is determined by the department and is based on factors such as the aircraft’s weight. The statute also outlines exemptions from registration, such as aircraft temporarily based in Wisconsin for repair or maintenance, or those registered in another state and only passing through Wisconsin airspace. However, for an aircraft that is demonstrably based in Wisconsin, meaning its primary location of operation or storage is within the state, registration is mandatory. This includes aircraft owned by Wisconsin residents or entities, or aircraft that are flown predominantly within Wisconsin’s borders. The core principle is that if an aircraft has a significant operational nexus to Wisconsin, it falls under the purview of state registration requirements.

The scenario involves a pilot operating an aircraft in Wisconsin airspace. Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning Aeronautics, and related administrative rules promulgated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) govern aviation activities within the state. A key aspect of this regulation is the requirement for pilots to adhere to specific operational rules, including those pertaining to low-altitude flight and the protection of persons and property on the ground. Wisconsin law, like federal regulations, generally prohibits reckless operation of aircraft, which includes flying at altitudes that endanger people or property. While there isn’t a single, universally applicable “minimum altitude” for all flight operations in Wisconsin that is a fixed number of feet above ground level in all circumstances, specific situations and locations have defined minimums. For instance, FAA regulations, which are also applicable in Wisconsin unless specifically superseded by state law with federal approval, generally set a minimum of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a 2,000-foot radius when flying over other than congested areas. However, the question focuses on the pilot’s conduct and the potential for endangerment. When a pilot is operating an aircraft at an altitude that is clearly unsafe for the prevailing conditions, regardless of a specific numerical minimum for that exact location, it constitutes a violation of the general principles of safe aviation practice and potentially specific Wisconsin statutes prohibiting reckless operation. The pilot’s action of flying at an altitude that causes alarm and potential hazard to individuals on the ground, even if not explicitly violating a precise altitude restriction for that particular airspace, demonstrates a disregard for safety that aligns with the intent of laws governing aviation operations. Therefore, the most appropriate legal conclusion is that the pilot’s actions are subject to review and potential penalty under Wisconsin’s aviation statutes due to the inherent danger created. The concept of “reckless operation” or “endangerment” is central here, which is addressed in Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114. The pilot’s judgment in selecting an altitude that poses a clear risk to those below is the core issue, irrespective of whether a precise numerical altitude restriction was breached. The pilot must always exercise due care and operate in a manner that does not create a hazard.

Wisconsin Statute 114.136, concerning airport zoning, grants municipalities the authority to adopt and enforce airport zoning ordinances. These ordinances are crucial for ensuring that the airspace around airports remains clear of obstructions, thereby promoting safe aircraft operations. The statute specifically empowers local governments to regulate land use and the height of structures within designated airport hazard zones. This is a proactive measure to prevent the development of conditions that could interfere with aircraft takeoffs, landings, or flight paths. The authority to create and enforce these zoning regulations is vested in the municipality that owns or operates the airport, or in cooperation with other municipalities that benefit from the airport’s operation. The purpose is to protect the public interest in aviation and the safety of persons and property on the ground and in the air. The zoning ordinances must be reasonable and not arbitrary, and they are subject to judicial review. The statute also outlines procedures for notice, hearings, and appeals related to the adoption and enforcement of these ordinances. The core principle is to balance the rights of property owners with the paramount need for aviation safety and the efficient operation of airports within Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Bureau of Aeronautics is responsible for overseeing aviation safety and development within the state. Wisconsin Statute Chapter 304, “Aeronautics,” outlines the powers and duties of the department concerning aviation. Specifically, Wis. Stat. § 304.02 grants the department the authority to make and amend rules and regulations for the safe and efficient use of Wisconsin’s airspace and public airports. This includes establishing standards for airport construction, operation, and maintenance, as well as rules for aircraft operations within the state’s jurisdiction, particularly concerning safety and public welfare. When a municipality or airport sponsor seeks to construct or alter a public-use airport within Wisconsin, they must obtain a certificate of approval from the WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics. This process ensures that the proposed development complies with state and federal regulations and will not create a hazard to air navigation or endanger the public. The statute emphasizes the department’s role in promoting aviation safety and the orderly development of aviation facilities across Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aeronautics within the state. Specifically, § 114.065 addresses the requirement for aircraft registration with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT). This statute mandates that all aircraft based in Wisconsin must be registered annually unless they are properly registered with the federal government and are not based in Wisconsin. The registration process involves submitting an application and a fee to the department. Failure to comply can result in penalties. The key concept here is the state’s authority to regulate aircraft operating within its jurisdiction, even if federally registered, when those aircraft have a primary base of operations within Wisconsin. This ensures the state can track aircraft for safety, operational, and revenue purposes. The question tests the understanding of when state registration is mandatory, distinguishing it from federal registration requirements and focusing on the concept of “based in Wisconsin.”

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aeronautics within the state. Specifically, Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter ATCP 51 addresses airport licensing and operation. This code outlines the requirements for obtaining and maintaining an airport license, including provisions for safety, maintenance, and operational standards. For an airport to be licensed in Wisconsin, it must meet certain criteria related to the physical characteristics of the airport, such as runway length and condition, obstruction clearance, and lighting. Furthermore, the airport operator must demonstrate the ability to maintain these standards and adhere to operational procedures that ensure the safety of aircraft operations. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation, through its Bureau of Aeronautics, is responsible for the administration and enforcement of these regulations. The licensing process involves an application, inspection, and ongoing compliance checks. Failure to maintain the required standards can result in suspension or revocation of the airport license. The regulations are designed to promote a safe and efficient aviation environment throughout Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Statute 114.135 governs the establishment and operation of airports within the state. Specifically, it outlines the powers and duties of municipalities in acquiring, improving, and operating airports, as well as provisions for land acquisition and eminent domain. The statute also addresses the establishment of airport zoning, which is crucial for ensuring safe airport operations by controlling the height of structures and other obstructions in the vicinity of airports. This zoning is typically enacted through ordinances that are consistent with federal regulations, such as those from the FAA, to create clear zones and approach surfaces. The process involves identifying hazards, defining permissible heights for structures based on their proximity to runways and flight paths, and providing mechanisms for enforcement and variances. Municipalities are empowered to adopt and enforce these zoning regulations to protect the public interest in aviation safety and the efficient use of airspace. The underlying principle is to prevent the creation of airport hazards that could endanger aircraft operations.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning aeronautics, outlines the framework for aviation within the state. A critical aspect of this framework is the regulation of airport zoning. Section 114.136 addresses airport zoning regulations. These regulations are designed to protect navigable airspace from obstruction and to promote the safe takeoff and landing of aircraft. The statute empowers political subdivisions, such as counties and municipalities, to adopt and enforce airport zoning ordinances. These ordinances typically define approach zones, transitional zones, horizontal zones, and other areas around airports where the height of structures is restricted. The purpose is to prevent the creation of hazards to air navigation. The authority to adopt these ordinances is derived from the state legislature, which delegates this power to local entities. The process usually involves public hearings and adherence to specific procedural requirements to ensure fairness and due process for property owners. The enforcement of these zoning regulations falls under the purview of the political subdivision that enacted them, with provisions for legal remedies in cases of non-compliance.

Wisconsin Statute 114.07 governs the operation of aircraft within the state, specifically addressing the conditions under which an aircraft may be operated without a certificated pilot. This statute, in conjunction with Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) Part 91, outlines exemptions for specific types of flights. For instance, flights conducted for instructional purposes by a certificated flight instructor are generally permitted. However, the key distinction lies in the purpose of the flight and the qualifications of the person operating the aircraft. When an aircraft is used for a purpose beyond simple instruction, such as demonstrating the aircraft for sale, the requirements for pilot certification become more stringent. Wisconsin law generally defers to federal regulations for pilot certification standards, but it retains authority over intrastate operations and the specific conditions under which aircraft may be flown within the state’s borders. Therefore, demonstrating an aircraft for sale, which often involves potential buyers who may not be pilots or who are evaluating the aircraft’s performance under simulated operational conditions, typically requires the pilot to hold at least a private pilot certificate, unless a specific exemption under FAR 91.109 or similar regulations applies, which is not the case in this scenario where the primary purpose is sales demonstration. The statute aims to ensure a baseline level of competency and safety for all aircraft operations within Wisconsin, particularly when those operations involve commercial aspects or public interaction.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aviation. Specifically, Section 114.13 outlines the requirements for airport zoning. An airport hazard is defined as any structure or tree that obstructs the airspace of an airport or is hazardous to aircraft operating in the vicinity of an airport. Airport zoning ordinances are enacted to prevent the creation or establishment of airport hazards. These ordinances typically regulate the height, location, and use of structures within designated zones surrounding an airport. The purpose is to ensure safe flight operations and protect the airport’s operational integrity. When a new structure is proposed near an airport in Wisconsin, the local zoning authority, often in conjunction with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Aeronautics, reviews the proposal against the established airport zoning ordinances. If the proposed structure, such as a new communication tower or a tall building, exceeds the permissible height limits or poses a significant obstruction according to the airport’s approach and departure path criteria, it would be considered an airport hazard. The correct response is that the proposed structure would be considered an airport hazard, subject to potential denial or modification based on the zoning ordinance. This is a core principle of airport safety and land-use planning to maintain navigable airspace.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) oversees aviation safety and regulation within the state. Wisconsin Statute §114.07, regarding aircraft registration, mandates that all aircraft operated within Wisconsin must be registered with the WisDOT unless specifically exempted. This registration process ensures accountability and aids in the enforcement of aviation laws. Exemptions typically apply to aircraft that are merely passing through the state, are registered in another state and are not based in Wisconsin, or are operated under specific federal regulations that preempt state registration requirements. For an aircraft based and regularly operated within Wisconsin, failing to secure the required state registration would constitute a violation of Wisconsin aviation law, potentially leading to penalties. The question asks about the legal requirement for an aircraft *based and regularly operated* within Wisconsin. Therefore, registration with the WisDOT is the pertinent legal obligation.

The scenario describes an aircraft operating within Wisconsin airspace, specifically in proximity to a non-towered airport. The pilot is attempting to establish communication and announce their position. Wisconsin’s aviation regulations, like those of many states, often align with or supplement Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines concerning communication protocols. For non-towered airports, the standard practice for pilots to announce their position and intentions is through the Unicom frequency, which is typically 122.8 MHz. This frequency is designated for advisory communications between aircraft and ground stations at non-towered airports. The pilot’s action of tuning to this frequency and making an announcement is a direct application of standard operating procedures designed to enhance situational awareness and safety by informing other aircraft in the vicinity of their presence and movements. This practice is crucial for collision avoidance in uncontrolled airspace. Wisconsin statutes and administrative codes, such as those found in Chapter ATCP 50, often reference or adopt federal standards for air traffic and pilot conduct, reinforcing the importance of established communication frequencies. Therefore, the correct frequency for making such an announcement at a non-towered airport in Wisconsin, following established aviation practices, is the Unicom frequency.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aviation. Specifically, § 114.06 outlines the requirements for aircraft registration. This statute mandates that all aircraft operated within Wisconsin, unless specifically exempted, must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The registration process involves submitting an application, paying a fee, and providing proof of ownership and airworthiness. The purpose of this registration is to identify aircraft operating within the state, ensure compliance with aviation laws, and facilitate the enforcement of regulations. Failure to register an aircraft as required can result in penalties, including fines and the prohibition of flight operations within Wisconsin. The statute also details the renewal process for registrations, which typically occurs annually. It is crucial for aircraft owners and operators to be aware of these requirements to maintain legal compliance and ensure safe and lawful aviation activities within the state of Wisconsin. The question tests the understanding of the fundamental legal requirement for aircraft operating within Wisconsin’s airspace, as stipulated by state statute, focusing on the proactive step of registration before operation.

Wisconsin Statute §114.07 governs the operation of aircraft within the state, specifically addressing conditions under which an aircraft is considered a public nuisance. This statute designates any aircraft operated within Wisconsin in violation of state or federal aviation laws, or in a manner that creates an unreasonable danger to persons or property, as a public nuisance. The statute further empowers the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) or any district attorney to maintain an action for injunction to prevent, abate, or remove such a nuisance. The core principle is that the operation of an aircraft, when it poses a significant and unreasonable risk or contravenes established legal frameworks, can be legally classified and addressed as a public nuisance. This legal classification allows for proactive measures to protect public safety and ensure compliance with aviation regulations. The statute does not mandate a specific numerical threshold for noise levels or altitude deviations to automatically qualify as a nuisance; rather, it relies on the qualitative assessment of the danger and the violation of existing laws.

Wisconsin Statute § 114.065 addresses the liability of an owner or operator of an aircraft for damage caused by the aircraft. This statute generally holds the owner or operator liable for damages caused by the operation of the aircraft, irrespective of negligence. This is a form of strict liability. However, the statute also includes a critical exception: if the damage is caused by the flight of an aircraft, the owner or operator is not liable if the damage was caused by a person other than the owner or operator, or by a person acting outside the scope of their employment with the owner or operator, and the owner or operator took reasonable care to prevent such damage. This exception is often interpreted to mean that if an aircraft is stolen and then causes damage, the owner might be absolved of liability if they can demonstrate they exercised reasonable care in securing the aircraft. The core principle is to balance the public interest in compensating those harmed by aviation with the fairness to aircraft owners. The statute aims to ensure that those who benefit from aviation activities also bear the responsibility for the inherent risks, but not for unforeseeable acts of third parties where reasonable precautions were taken. The concept of “reasonable care” in this context involves measures such as securing the aircraft, ensuring proper maintenance, and employing competent personnel. The absence of negligence on the part of the owner or operator is not, by itself, a defense under the general rule, but it becomes relevant when considering the statutory exception related to third-party actions and the owner’s preventative measures.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Bureau of Aeronautics is responsible for overseeing aviation safety and development within the state. When a proposed airport development project, such as the construction of a new runway or the expansion of an existing one, is planned by a municipality or a private entity in Wisconsin, it must undergo a review process to ensure compliance with state aviation laws and regulations. This review is critical for ensuring that the development is safe, efficient, and aligns with the state’s overall aviation system plan. The process typically involves submitting detailed plans and specifications to the WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics for approval. This approval is a prerequisite for commencing construction and is based on factors including airspace compatibility, environmental considerations, safety standards, and compatibility with other existing or planned aviation facilities in Wisconsin. The specific requirements and the depth of review can vary depending on the scale and nature of the project. The objective is to maintain a high standard of aviation safety and to promote the orderly development of aviation infrastructure across Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning aeronautics, outlines the framework for aviation regulation within the state. Section 114.09 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Wisconsin for more than 30 consecutive days must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The purpose of this registration is to provide a clear record of ownership and operational status within the state, aiding in regulatory oversight and enforcement. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can result in penalties, including fines. The statute distinguishes between temporary use and establishing a primary base of operation. An aircraft is considered based in Wisconsin if it is kept, stored, or operated within the state for a period exceeding 30 consecutive days, regardless of whether it is also registered in another state. This is a key distinction for aircraft owners who may operate their aircraft in multiple jurisdictions. The 30-day threshold is a critical determinant for establishing the requirement for Wisconsin registration.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically § 114.065, addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires that any aircraft based in Wisconsin for more than 60 consecutive days in any 12-month period must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Aircraft registration is a state-level requirement designed to track aircraft operating within the state, ensure compliance with state aviation laws, and facilitate taxation where applicable. The 60-day threshold is a key indicator of an aircraft’s primary operational base within Wisconsin. Failure to register an aircraft that meets this criterion can result in penalties as outlined by state law. The purpose of this registration is distinct from federal registration with the FAA, which pertains to airworthiness and ownership at the national level. State registration focuses on the operational presence and use of the aircraft within the specific jurisdiction of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Statute 114.115 outlines the requirements for aircraft registration and the associated fees. The statute specifies that for aircraft weighing more than 3,000 pounds but not more than 5,000 pounds, the annual registration fee is \( \$50 \). For aircraft weighing more than 5,000 pounds but not more than 10,000 pounds, the annual registration fee is \( \$75 \). For aircraft weighing more than 10,000 pounds, the annual registration fee is \( \$100 \). A pilot is registering a twin-engine aircraft used for charter operations in Wisconsin that has a maximum takeoff weight of 8,500 pounds. Therefore, the aircraft falls into the category of weighing more than 5,000 pounds but not more than 10,000 pounds. This category mandates an annual registration fee of \( \$75 \). The question tests the understanding of Wisconsin’s specific aircraft weight-based registration fee structure as detailed in the relevant state statutes, requiring the application of the correct fee based on the provided aircraft weight.

Wisconsin Statute 114.10 defines “air carrier” and outlines specific requirements for those operating within the state. This statute, along with associated administrative rules promulgated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, governs the certification and operational standards for intrastate air carriers. The core principle is ensuring public safety and providing a framework for regulated air transportation services within Wisconsin. An entity is considered an air carrier under Wisconsin law if it engages in the business of transporting passengers or property for hire by aircraft between points within the state of Wisconsin. This definition is critical for distinguishing between private operations and those subject to state economic and safety oversight. The statute focuses on the commercial aspect of transportation for compensation within Wisconsin’s borders.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning aeronautics, outlines the framework for aviation within the state. Section 114.09 addresses the licensing and registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft operating within Wisconsin airspace must be properly registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, unless specifically exempted by federal or state law. The registration process ensures that the state has a record of aircraft operating within its jurisdiction for safety, regulatory, and emergency response purposes. Failure to comply with registration requirements can result in penalties, including fines and the prohibition of flight operations within Wisconsin. The statute’s intent is to maintain a secure and orderly aviation environment by ensuring all aircraft are accounted for and meet basic operational standards. This principle extends to ensuring that aircraft are operated by properly certified pilots, though the specific question focuses on the aircraft’s registration status.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114, specifically concerning aeronautics, outlines the framework for aviation regulation within the state. Section 114.065 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Wisconsin for more than 60 consecutive days must be registered with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The purpose of this registration is to establish a clear record of aircraft ownership and operational presence within the state, aiding in enforcement of state aviation laws and facilitating accident investigations. Failure to comply can result in penalties. The statute does not differentiate based on the type of flight operation (e.g., commercial, private, instructional) for this registration requirement, as long as the aircraft is based in Wisconsin. The key determinant is the duration of the aircraft’s presence and its operational base within the state.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Bureau of Aeronautics is responsible for the administration and enforcement of aviation laws within the state. Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 114 governs aeronautics. Specifically, Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter TRANS 100 outlines regulations concerning airport licensing, operation, and safety standards. When an airport operator in Wisconsin fails to maintain required safety standards, leading to a potential hazard, the WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics has the authority to take corrective action. This authority is derived from the state’s police powers and its mandate to ensure public safety in aviation. The process typically involves notification to the operator, an opportunity to correct the deficiency, and, if unaddressed, potential suspension or revocation of the airport license. The relevant statute grants the department the power to enforce these regulations to protect the flying public and ensure the safe operation of airports. The specific authority to issue orders for corrective action and to suspend or revoke licenses for non-compliance with safety standards is a core function of the Bureau of Aeronautics under Chapter 114 of the Wisconsin Statutes and related administrative rules.