Quiz-summary
0 of 30 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
Information
Premium Practice Questions
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 30 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 30
1. Question
A farmer in western North Dakota, holding a valid water permit for irrigation issued in 1985, ceased diverting water from the Missouri River in 2017 due to persistent drought conditions and a shift to dryland farming practices. The permit was for a diversion of 1000 acre-feet annually for beneficial use on 200 acres. The farmer has made no diversions or attempts to use the water since 2017, nor has there been any communication with the State Water Commission regarding a temporary suspension or intent to resume use. A new agricultural cooperative in the region has applied for a water permit to irrigate a new crop requiring significant water resources. Under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system, what is the most likely legal status of the farmer’s original water right concerning the cooperative’s application?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law, like many Western states, operates under a prior appropriation doctrine, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use gains a senior water right. Subsequent users obtain junior rights, meaning they can only use water after senior rights have been fully satisfied, particularly during times of scarcity. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, requiring water to be used for a recognized purpose that benefits society, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and must be efficient. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a continuous period, typically five years, demonstrating an intent to cease the beneficial use. This non-use must be coupled with an intent to abandon, not merely temporary inability to use. The North Dakota State Water Commission oversees water permits and adjudications. In the given scenario, the existing permit holder’s failure to divert and use water for a period exceeding five years, without any demonstrated intent to resume the beneficial use, strongly suggests the potential for abandonment under North Dakota law. This would allow for the reallocation of that water right to new applicants who can demonstrate a beneficial use.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law, like many Western states, operates under a prior appropriation doctrine, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use gains a senior water right. Subsequent users obtain junior rights, meaning they can only use water after senior rights have been fully satisfied, particularly during times of scarcity. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, requiring water to be used for a recognized purpose that benefits society, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and must be efficient. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a continuous period, typically five years, demonstrating an intent to cease the beneficial use. This non-use must be coupled with an intent to abandon, not merely temporary inability to use. The North Dakota State Water Commission oversees water permits and adjudications. In the given scenario, the existing permit holder’s failure to divert and use water for a period exceeding five years, without any demonstrated intent to resume the beneficial use, strongly suggests the potential for abandonment under North Dakota law. This would allow for the reallocation of that water right to new applicants who can demonstrate a beneficial use.
-
Question 2 of 30
2. Question
A farmer in Bowman County, North Dakota, holds a valid water permit to divert water from the Little Missouri River for irrigation. The farmer wishes to move the point of diversion approximately two miles upstream to access a more consistent flow during drier periods. What is the critical legal principle the State Water Commission will primarily consider when evaluating this proposed change in point of diversion?
Correct
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights. This means that the first person to put water to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water. When considering a change in the point of diversion for an existing water permit, the primary concern is whether the change will impair the rights of other water users. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) § 61-04-15 outlines the requirements for such changes. Specifically, a permittee must apply to the State Water Commission for approval of any change in the point of diversion, location of use, or place of use. The commission will review the application to ensure that the proposed change does not adversely affect the water rights of other appropriators. This involves assessing the impact on the overall water supply and the established rights of downstream users or other permit holders who may rely on the same water source. If the change is approved, the permit will be amended to reflect the new conditions. If the change is denied, the permittee must adhere to the original terms of the permit. The concept of “impairment” is central to this process, meaning that the change cannot cause other users to receive less water than they are entitled to under their own permits, nor can it negatively affect the usability of the water for their authorized purposes.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights. This means that the first person to put water to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water. When considering a change in the point of diversion for an existing water permit, the primary concern is whether the change will impair the rights of other water users. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) § 61-04-15 outlines the requirements for such changes. Specifically, a permittee must apply to the State Water Commission for approval of any change in the point of diversion, location of use, or place of use. The commission will review the application to ensure that the proposed change does not adversely affect the water rights of other appropriators. This involves assessing the impact on the overall water supply and the established rights of downstream users or other permit holders who may rely on the same water source. If the change is approved, the permit will be amended to reflect the new conditions. If the change is denied, the permittee must adhere to the original terms of the permit. The concept of “impairment” is central to this process, meaning that the change cannot cause other users to receive less water than they are entitled to under their own permits, nor can it negatively affect the usability of the water for their authorized purposes.
-
Question 3 of 30
3. Question
A farmer in Morton County, North Dakota, holding a valid permit to divert water from the Heart River for irrigation, wishes to sell their water right to a developer planning to use the water for a new industrial facility in Stark County. The proposed transfer involves a different point of diversion and a different place of use. Under North Dakota water law, what is the primary legal consideration the State Water Commission must evaluate before approving such a transfer?
Correct
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights, meaning the first person to divert and use water for a beneficial purpose gains a senior right to that water. This is often summarized as “first in time, first in right.” When considering the transfer of a water right, North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Section 61-04-26 outlines the process. A water right permit holder may transfer their right, but this transfer is subject to the approval of the State Water Commission. The key consideration for approval is that the transfer must not adversely affect the rights of other existing water users. This means that the proposed new use or place of use cannot diminish the quantity or quality of water available to senior appropriators or otherwise impair their vested rights. The transfer of a water right is not automatic; it requires a formal application and review process to ensure compliance with the prior appropriation doctrine and the protection of existing water users within the state’s water management framework.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights, meaning the first person to divert and use water for a beneficial purpose gains a senior right to that water. This is often summarized as “first in time, first in right.” When considering the transfer of a water right, North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Section 61-04-26 outlines the process. A water right permit holder may transfer their right, but this transfer is subject to the approval of the State Water Commission. The key consideration for approval is that the transfer must not adversely affect the rights of other existing water users. This means that the proposed new use or place of use cannot diminish the quantity or quality of water available to senior appropriators or otherwise impair their vested rights. The transfer of a water right is not automatic; it requires a formal application and review process to ensure compliance with the prior appropriation doctrine and the protection of existing water users within the state’s water management framework.
-
Question 4 of 30
4. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who holds a valid permit to divert \(100\) acre-feet of water annually from the Little Missouri River for irrigation, wishes to sell their land and associated water right to a developer planning a commercial facility. The developer intends to use the water for industrial cooling. The proposed transfer would involve a change in the point of diversion and the place of use. What is the primary legal consideration the State Water Commission must evaluate to approve this transfer of a surface water right under North Dakota law?
Correct
In North Dakota, the appropriation of surface water is governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation, meaning the first to put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system prioritizes existing rights when water is scarce. However, the state also recognizes the importance of groundwater and its management. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04 establishes the framework for water rights, including the requirement for a permit to appropriate water from any public watercourse. The State Water Commission is the primary administrative body responsible for issuing these permits and adjudicating water rights. When considering the transfer of a water right, the process involves demonstrating that the transfer will not impair existing water rights and that the new use is also a beneficial use. This ensures the integrity of the prior appropriation system. The concept of “beneficial use” is central and includes uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and others deemed beneficial by the state. Impairment of existing rights is a critical factor; if a proposed new appropriation or transfer would diminish the quantity or quality of water available to a senior appropriator, it would typically be denied or conditioned. The administration of water rights is a dynamic process, balancing the needs of various users and the protection of the resource itself.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the appropriation of surface water is governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation, meaning the first to put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system prioritizes existing rights when water is scarce. However, the state also recognizes the importance of groundwater and its management. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04 establishes the framework for water rights, including the requirement for a permit to appropriate water from any public watercourse. The State Water Commission is the primary administrative body responsible for issuing these permits and adjudicating water rights. When considering the transfer of a water right, the process involves demonstrating that the transfer will not impair existing water rights and that the new use is also a beneficial use. This ensures the integrity of the prior appropriation system. The concept of “beneficial use” is central and includes uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and others deemed beneficial by the state. Impairment of existing rights is a critical factor; if a proposed new appropriation or transfer would diminish the quantity or quality of water available to a senior appropriator, it would typically be denied or conditioned. The administration of water rights is a dynamic process, balancing the needs of various users and the protection of the resource itself.
-
Question 5 of 30
5. Question
Consider a scenario in North Dakota where two individuals, Anya and Bjorn, have permits to divert water from the same intermittent stream. Anya’s permit, issued in 1985, allows for the diversion of 100 acre-feet per year for irrigation of 50 acres of cropland. Bjorn’s permit, issued in 1995, allows for the diversion of 75 acre-feet per year for livestock watering and domestic use on his ranch. During a severe drought year, the stream flow is only sufficient to meet 80% of the total permitted diversions. Under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system, what is the most accurate description of how the available water will be allocated?
Correct
In North Dakota, the appropriation of surface water is governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has a senior water right. Subsequent users acquire junior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior users receive any water. This system is administered by the State Engineer, who issues permits for water use. A permit typically specifies the source of water, the amount that can be diverted, the period of use, and the beneficial use for which the water is intended. Beneficial uses are defined by statute and include domestic, agricultural, industrial, and other purposes that are recognized as promoting the public welfare. The concept of “beneficial use” is crucial; water rights are not absolute but are tied to the actual application of water to a recognized beneficial purpose. Waste of water is prohibited. The State Engineer has the authority to investigate potential waste and to modify or revoke permits if water is not being used beneficially or if the terms of the permit are violated. The priority date of a water right is established when the application for a permit is filed with the State Engineer and the permit is subsequently issued. This priority date is paramount in times of shortage.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the appropriation of surface water is governed by the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has a senior water right. Subsequent users acquire junior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior users receive any water. This system is administered by the State Engineer, who issues permits for water use. A permit typically specifies the source of water, the amount that can be diverted, the period of use, and the beneficial use for which the water is intended. Beneficial uses are defined by statute and include domestic, agricultural, industrial, and other purposes that are recognized as promoting the public welfare. The concept of “beneficial use” is crucial; water rights are not absolute but are tied to the actual application of water to a recognized beneficial purpose. Waste of water is prohibited. The State Engineer has the authority to investigate potential waste and to modify or revoke permits if water is not being used beneficially or if the terms of the permit are violated. The priority date of a water right is established when the application for a permit is filed with the State Engineer and the permit is subsequently issued. This priority date is paramount in times of shortage.
-
Question 6 of 30
6. Question
A landowner in western North Dakota, who holds a senior water permit for irrigation from the Little Missouri River, wishes to transfer their entire water right to a different parcel of land located approximately five miles downstream on the same river. The proposed new location of diversion is also downstream from the original point of diversion. The landowner asserts that the transfer will not impact any other water users as the water is already being diverted from the river. Which of the following legal principles, as applied under North Dakota water law, is most critical for the state engineer to consider when evaluating this transfer request?
Correct
North Dakota follows the prior appropriation doctrine for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine is codified in North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, which governs the appropriation of water. When considering the transfer of a water right, the primary legal test is whether the transfer will impair existing water rights. This impairment analysis focuses on whether the proposed change in use, location of diversion, or point of diversion would diminish the quantity or quality of water available to senior appropriators or otherwise adversely affect their vested rights. NDCC 61-04-16 outlines the requirements for a change in an appropriation, stating that a change in the point of diversion, place of use, or purpose of use of water may be permitted by the state engineer if it does not materially injure other lawful users of water. The key is to assess the potential impact on the hydrological system and the rights of those who have already established their claims to the water. If a proposed transfer creates a risk of such injury, it will not be approved. This principle ensures the stability and predictability of water rights within the state.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows the prior appropriation doctrine for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine is codified in North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, which governs the appropriation of water. When considering the transfer of a water right, the primary legal test is whether the transfer will impair existing water rights. This impairment analysis focuses on whether the proposed change in use, location of diversion, or point of diversion would diminish the quantity or quality of water available to senior appropriators or otherwise adversely affect their vested rights. NDCC 61-04-16 outlines the requirements for a change in an appropriation, stating that a change in the point of diversion, place of use, or purpose of use of water may be permitted by the state engineer if it does not materially injure other lawful users of water. The key is to assess the potential impact on the hydrological system and the rights of those who have already established their claims to the water. If a proposed transfer creates a risk of such injury, it will not be approved. This principle ensures the stability and predictability of water rights within the state.
-
Question 7 of 30
7. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, operating under a valid water permit issued in 1975 for irrigation purposes along the Little Missouri River, observes a significant increase in agricultural activity upstream since 2010, with new permits granted for crop irrigation and livestock watering. The rancher’s historical diversions, previously consistent, have recently been insufficient to irrigate their entire acreage during critical summer months. The rancher believes their ability to divert water is being impaired by these newer appropriations. What is the primary legal principle that governs the rancher’s claim and the State Engineer’s review of this situation in North Dakota?
Correct
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights. This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water. Subsequent users can only appropriate water that is not already claimed by senior appropriators. The State Water Commission is responsible for administering water rights and ensuring that all water is used in accordance with the law. When considering a new appropriation, the commission must assess whether the proposed use will impair existing rights. This involves examining the flow rates, historical diversions, and the nature of existing appropriations. If a proposed appropriation would reduce the available water below the needs of senior rights holders, it will be denied or conditioned. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and power generation, but it must be a use that is recognized as proper and for the public good. The State Engineer, under the direction of the State Water Commission, manages the records of all water rights. The process for obtaining a new water permit involves an application, public notice, and a review by the State Engineer to ensure compliance with the prior appropriation doctrine and other statutory requirements, including the prevention of waste and the protection of existing rights.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights. This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water. Subsequent users can only appropriate water that is not already claimed by senior appropriators. The State Water Commission is responsible for administering water rights and ensuring that all water is used in accordance with the law. When considering a new appropriation, the commission must assess whether the proposed use will impair existing rights. This involves examining the flow rates, historical diversions, and the nature of existing appropriations. If a proposed appropriation would reduce the available water below the needs of senior rights holders, it will be denied or conditioned. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and power generation, but it must be a use that is recognized as proper and for the public good. The State Engineer, under the direction of the State Water Commission, manages the records of all water rights. The process for obtaining a new water permit involves an application, public notice, and a review by the State Engineer to ensure compliance with the prior appropriation doctrine and other statutory requirements, including the prevention of waste and the protection of existing rights.
-
Question 8 of 30
8. Question
Consider a historical water user in North Dakota who obtained a permit in 1920 to divert water from the Missouri River for agricultural irrigation, a permit that has been continuously used and maintained since its inception. A new industrial facility is established in 2010 and receives a permit to divert water from the same river for cooling purposes. If a severe drought significantly reduces the available flow of the Missouri River, what principle of North Dakota water law will govern the allocation of water between these two users during the period of scarcity?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the prior appropriation doctrine, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the person who first put water to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water, and subsequent users have junior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full appropriation before junior rights holders receive any water. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of this doctrine, requiring that water be used for a purpose that is recognized as beneficial by the state, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and that it be used efficiently and without waste. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, administers water rights in North Dakota. Permits are required for most water uses, and these permits specify the source of water, the amount that can be diverted, the period of use, and the purpose of the use. Abandonment of a water right can occur if a water user ceases to divert or use water for a beneficial purpose for a statutory period, indicating an intent to abandon the right. This principle ensures that water resources are utilized efficiently and are not held idly. The concept of riparian rights, which is common in some other states and grants water rights to landowners adjacent to a watercourse, is not the primary basis for water allocation in North Dakota.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the prior appropriation doctrine, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the person who first put water to a beneficial use has the senior right to that water, and subsequent users have junior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full appropriation before junior rights holders receive any water. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of this doctrine, requiring that water be used for a purpose that is recognized as beneficial by the state, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and that it be used efficiently and without waste. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, administers water rights in North Dakota. Permits are required for most water uses, and these permits specify the source of water, the amount that can be diverted, the period of use, and the purpose of the use. Abandonment of a water right can occur if a water user ceases to divert or use water for a beneficial purpose for a statutory period, indicating an intent to abandon the right. This principle ensures that water resources are utilized efficiently and are not held idly. The concept of riparian rights, which is common in some other states and grants water rights to landowners adjacent to a watercourse, is not the primary basis for water allocation in North Dakota.
-
Question 9 of 30
9. Question
A farmer in western North Dakota, holding a senior water right to divert 100 acre-feet per year from the Little Missouri River for irrigation, wishes to sell this right to a municipal water supplier for domestic use within a nearby town. The proposed transfer involves a different point of diversion upstream from the original. Under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system, what is the primary legal consideration the State Water Commission must evaluate before approving such a transfer?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law, rooted in the prior appropriation doctrine, dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use gains a superior right to that water. This right is quantified and specific to the point of diversion and the beneficial use. When considering the transfer of water rights, North Dakota law, as outlined in statutes like NDCC § 61-04-23, generally allows for the transfer of a water right, provided that the transfer does not impair existing water rights. The process involves an application to the State Water Commission, which then evaluates the proposed change. Crucially, the law emphasizes that the original beneficial use is not abandoned if the water right is transferred to a new user or a new use, as long as the transfer is approved and the water continues to be used beneficially without detriment to others. This principle ensures the efficient allocation of a scarce resource while protecting the established rights of existing appropriators. The key consideration in any transfer is the prevention of impairment, meaning that the new use or place of use cannot negatively impact the water supply available to senior water rights holders.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law, rooted in the prior appropriation doctrine, dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use gains a superior right to that water. This right is quantified and specific to the point of diversion and the beneficial use. When considering the transfer of water rights, North Dakota law, as outlined in statutes like NDCC § 61-04-23, generally allows for the transfer of a water right, provided that the transfer does not impair existing water rights. The process involves an application to the State Water Commission, which then evaluates the proposed change. Crucially, the law emphasizes that the original beneficial use is not abandoned if the water right is transferred to a new user or a new use, as long as the transfer is approved and the water continues to be used beneficially without detriment to others. This principle ensures the efficient allocation of a scarce resource while protecting the established rights of existing appropriators. The key consideration in any transfer is the prevention of impairment, meaning that the new use or place of use cannot negatively impact the water supply available to senior water rights holders.
-
Question 10 of 30
10. Question
A farmer in North Dakota holds a valid water permit issued in 1955 for agricultural irrigation from the Missouri River, allowing a diversion of 500 acre-feet per year for crop production. In 2023, seeking to diversify income, the farmer begins diverting a portion of this water to supply a newly established gravel washing operation on their property, a use not specified in the original permit. The gravel washing operation requires 100 acre-feet annually. Assuming there is ample water available in the Missouri River and no other junior water rights holders are currently experiencing shortages, what is the most likely legal consequence for the farmer’s actions under North Dakota water law?
Correct
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This principle dictates that the earliest established water rights have priority over later ones during times of scarcity. The State Engineer administers water rights, issuing permits for beneficial use. A permit specifies the source of water, the amount that can be withdrawn, the period of use, and the specific beneficial use for which the water is intended. Transfers of water rights are permitted but must be approved by the State Engineer to ensure the transfer does not impair existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, requiring that water be used efficiently and for a recognized purpose, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and not be wasted. Diversion of water for a purpose not specified in the permit, or in excess of the permitted amount, constitutes an unlawful diversion and can lead to forfeiture or cancellation of the water right. The State Engineer has the authority to investigate alleged violations and take enforcement actions. In this scenario, the farmer’s diversion for a new industrial purpose, not originally permitted, and without State Engineer approval, violates the core principles of prior appropriation and beneficial use. This unauthorized diversion, even if the water source has surplus flow, is a violation of the established water right’s terms and conditions.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This principle dictates that the earliest established water rights have priority over later ones during times of scarcity. The State Engineer administers water rights, issuing permits for beneficial use. A permit specifies the source of water, the amount that can be withdrawn, the period of use, and the specific beneficial use for which the water is intended. Transfers of water rights are permitted but must be approved by the State Engineer to ensure the transfer does not impair existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, requiring that water be used efficiently and for a recognized purpose, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and not be wasted. Diversion of water for a purpose not specified in the permit, or in excess of the permitted amount, constitutes an unlawful diversion and can lead to forfeiture or cancellation of the water right. The State Engineer has the authority to investigate alleged violations and take enforcement actions. In this scenario, the farmer’s diversion for a new industrial purpose, not originally permitted, and without State Engineer approval, violates the core principles of prior appropriation and beneficial use. This unauthorized diversion, even if the water source has surplus flow, is a violation of the established water right’s terms and conditions.
-
Question 11 of 30
11. Question
Consider a scenario in western North Dakota where two water permits have been issued for diversions from the Little Missouri River. Permit #101, granted in 1955, allows for the irrigation of 80 acres of farmland. Permit #202, granted in 1978, allows for the diversion of water for municipal supply to a growing town. During a severe drought in 2023, the Little Missouri River’s flow is significantly reduced. If the river can only supply 50% of the total authorized diversions, what is the primary legal principle governing the allocation of this limited water supply to the permit holders?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use establishes a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to existing senior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation of water before any junior rights holders receive any water. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in arid and semi-arid regions like North Dakota, ensuring predictability and stability for water users. The State Water Commission is responsible for administering these water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, meaning water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or private interest, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and cannot be wasted. The concept of “waste” is critical; a water user cannot divert more water than is reasonably needed for their beneficial use, nor can they allow water to escape their control without being put to beneficial use.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use establishes a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to existing senior rights. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation of water before any junior rights holders receive any water. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in arid and semi-arid regions like North Dakota, ensuring predictability and stability for water users. The State Water Commission is responsible for administering these water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, meaning water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or private interest, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and cannot be wasted. The concept of “waste” is critical; a water user cannot divert more water than is reasonably needed for their beneficial use, nor can they allow water to escape their control without being put to beneficial use.
-
Question 12 of 30
12. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who holds a valid water permit for livestock watering from the Little Missouri River, has not utilized the permit for the past six consecutive years due to a prolonged period of severe drought that rendered the river flow insufficient for their needs. During this time, the rancher continued to pay the annual permit fees and maintained their stock watering facilities, including the pipeline and troughs, with the expressed intention of resuming use as soon as adequate water became available. The State Water Commission is now considering whether this water right has been abandoned. Based on North Dakota’s prior appropriation principles and statutory provisions regarding abandonment, what is the most likely legal determination regarding the rancher’s water right?
Correct
North Dakota follows the doctrine of prior appropriation for water rights, meaning the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the senior right. This principle is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the abandonment of a water right, North Dakota law, specifically North Dakota Century Code Section 61-04-30, outlines the conditions under which a water right may be deemed abandoned. Abandonment occurs when a water right holder intentionally relinquishes their right or fails to use the water for a period of five consecutive years, provided such non-use is not due to unavoidable causes or acts of God. The intent to abandon is a crucial element, and non-use alone is not conclusive evidence of abandonment if the holder can demonstrate a continuous intent to resume the beneficial use. For example, if a farmer with an irrigation right experiences a drought that prevents them from using water for three years but they continue to maintain their irrigation equipment and express their intent to irrigate as soon as conditions allow, their right would likely not be considered abandoned. Conversely, if the farmer ceased all maintenance and made no effort to resume irrigation for five years, the right could be subject to forfeiture. The State Water Commission plays a role in reviewing claims of abandonment.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows the doctrine of prior appropriation for water rights, meaning the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the senior right. This principle is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the abandonment of a water right, North Dakota law, specifically North Dakota Century Code Section 61-04-30, outlines the conditions under which a water right may be deemed abandoned. Abandonment occurs when a water right holder intentionally relinquishes their right or fails to use the water for a period of five consecutive years, provided such non-use is not due to unavoidable causes or acts of God. The intent to abandon is a crucial element, and non-use alone is not conclusive evidence of abandonment if the holder can demonstrate a continuous intent to resume the beneficial use. For example, if a farmer with an irrigation right experiences a drought that prevents them from using water for three years but they continue to maintain their irrigation equipment and express their intent to irrigate as soon as conditions allow, their right would likely not be considered abandoned. Conversely, if the farmer ceased all maintenance and made no effort to resume irrigation for five years, the right could be subject to forfeiture. The State Water Commission plays a role in reviewing claims of abandonment.
-
Question 13 of 30
13. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who secured a decreed water right in 1955 for irrigating 100 acres of pasture along the Little Missouri River, decides to sell a portion of their land, including the associated water right, to a developer planning to build a small resort. The developer intends to use the water for landscaping, a swimming pool, and general resort operations, all of which are considered beneficial uses under North Dakota law. The original rancher’s water right specifies a maximum annual diversion of 500 acre-feet for irrigation. The developer plans to divert a total of 450 acre-feet annually for the resort’s needs. Assuming the developer properly files for a transfer of the water right and that the proposed uses are indeed beneficial and do not negatively impact downstream senior water rights, what is the most accurate description of the legal status of the developer’s intended water use under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the prior appropriation doctrine, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has a superior right to that water over subsequent users. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of this system and is defined by North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) § 61-04-01 as “the use of water for domestic, agricultural, industrial, commercial, recreational, or other purposes, or for the generation of power, or for the disposal of sewage, or for the preservation of fish and wildlife, or for any other purpose that is of use or benefit to the state or its inhabitants.” The concept of “beneficial use” is not static and can evolve with technological advancements and changing societal needs, but it always requires an actual, useful application of water. A decreed water right is a formal recognition of this beneficial use, establishing the priority date, the amount of water, and the specific use for which the water may be diverted. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering these water rights. Transfer of a water right requires approval from the State Engineer to ensure the transfer does not impair existing rights and that the water continues to be used for a beneficial purpose.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the prior appropriation doctrine, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has a superior right to that water over subsequent users. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of this system and is defined by North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) § 61-04-01 as “the use of water for domestic, agricultural, industrial, commercial, recreational, or other purposes, or for the generation of power, or for the disposal of sewage, or for the preservation of fish and wildlife, or for any other purpose that is of use or benefit to the state or its inhabitants.” The concept of “beneficial use” is not static and can evolve with technological advancements and changing societal needs, but it always requires an actual, useful application of water. A decreed water right is a formal recognition of this beneficial use, establishing the priority date, the amount of water, and the specific use for which the water may be diverted. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering these water rights. Transfer of a water right requires approval from the State Engineer to ensure the transfer does not impair existing rights and that the water continues to be used for a beneficial purpose.
-
Question 14 of 30
14. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who holds a senior water right established in 1905 for irrigation of 100 acres along the Little Missouri River, wishes to sell a portion of their water right to a developer planning a new commercial facility in a nearby town. The developer intends to use the water for industrial cooling and domestic supply, a different purpose than the original irrigation. The rancher’s existing water permit allows for a diversion of 2 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the irrigation season. The proposed transfer would divert 0.5 cfs to the town’s municipal system and the industrial facility, with the remaining 1.5 cfs still available for the rancher’s irrigation. The State Water Board is reviewing the application for transfer. What is the primary legal consideration the State Water Board must evaluate before approving this transfer under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system?
Correct
North Dakota follows the prior appropriation doctrine for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When considering the transfer of a water right, North Dakota law, specifically under Chapter 61-04 of the North Dakota Century Code, requires that such transfers must not adversely affect existing water rights. This means that a senior water right holder cannot have their supply diminished or their ability to use their water impaired by a transfer granted to a junior user. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Board, is responsible for reviewing and approving these transfers. The process involves assessing the potential impact on other appropriators and the public interest. If a transfer is approved, it is typically subject to conditions to ensure no harm to existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is also fundamental, meaning water must be used for a purpose recognized by law and in a manner that does not waste it. A change in the point of diversion, place of use, or purpose of use of a water right generally constitutes a transfer and is subject to this review process. The core principle is to protect the integrity of the established water right system and prevent detrimental changes for other lawful users.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows the prior appropriation doctrine for water rights, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When considering the transfer of a water right, North Dakota law, specifically under Chapter 61-04 of the North Dakota Century Code, requires that such transfers must not adversely affect existing water rights. This means that a senior water right holder cannot have their supply diminished or their ability to use their water impaired by a transfer granted to a junior user. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Board, is responsible for reviewing and approving these transfers. The process involves assessing the potential impact on other appropriators and the public interest. If a transfer is approved, it is typically subject to conditions to ensure no harm to existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is also fundamental, meaning water must be used for a purpose recognized by law and in a manner that does not waste it. A change in the point of diversion, place of use, or purpose of use of a water right generally constitutes a transfer and is subject to this review process. The core principle is to protect the integrity of the established water right system and prevent detrimental changes for other lawful users.
-
Question 15 of 30
15. Question
A farmer in western North Dakota, who holds a valid water permit for irrigation from the Little Missouri River, wishes to transfer their entire water right to a commercial entity for industrial processing. The proposed new use would divert water at the same point but would operate year-round, whereas the original permit was for seasonal irrigation. What is the primary legal consideration the North Dakota State Engineer must evaluate before approving this transfer of water rights?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine governs the allocation of surface water resources. When considering the transfer of water rights, North Dakota law, as outlined in the North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, requires that any proposed change in the use of water, or in the point of diversion or place of use, must be approved by the State Engineer. This approval is contingent upon the change not impairing existing water rights. Impairment is assessed by considering the potential impact on downstream users and other appropriators. The process involves an application for a change, a review by the State Engineer, and potentially public notice and a hearing if objections are raised. If the State Engineer determines that the change would impair existing rights, the application will be denied. The law emphasizes the protection of established water rights and the efficient use of the state’s water resources. The concept of “beneficial use” is also fundamental, meaning water must be used for a purpose that is recognized as valuable and advantageous to the state.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, meaning “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine governs the allocation of surface water resources. When considering the transfer of water rights, North Dakota law, as outlined in the North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, requires that any proposed change in the use of water, or in the point of diversion or place of use, must be approved by the State Engineer. This approval is contingent upon the change not impairing existing water rights. Impairment is assessed by considering the potential impact on downstream users and other appropriators. The process involves an application for a change, a review by the State Engineer, and potentially public notice and a hearing if objections are raised. If the State Engineer determines that the change would impair existing rights, the application will be denied. The law emphasizes the protection of established water rights and the efficient use of the state’s water resources. The concept of “beneficial use” is also fundamental, meaning water must be used for a purpose that is recognized as valuable and advantageous to the state.
-
Question 16 of 30
16. Question
A severe drought has gripped western North Dakota, significantly reducing streamflow in the Little Missouri River. Ms. Anya Sharma holds a water permit issued in 1975 for agricultural irrigation, diverting 100 acre-feet per year. Mr. Ben Carter obtained a permit in 1995 for industrial cooling purposes, also with an allocation of 100 acre-feet per year. During the current drought, the river’s flow is only sufficient to meet 75% of the historical diversions for all users. Ms. Sharma has only received 70 acre-feet of her permitted allocation, impacting her crops. Mr. Carter, however, continues to divert his full 100 acre-feet. What is the most accurate legal standing of Ms. Sharma’s situation under North Dakota’s prior appropriation doctrine, considering the drought and Mr. Carter’s actions?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use generally has a senior right to that water. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior rights holders receive any water. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law in North Dakota, meaning the water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or the user, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and it must be used efficiently. Abandonment of a water right can occur if a water user ceases to divert and use the water for a beneficial purpose for a statutory period, indicating an intent to relinquish the right. The State Water Commission plays a crucial role in administering water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. A permit is required to divert and use water, and the terms of the permit, including the amount of water and the beneficial use, are critical. If a junior appropriator continues to divert water despite a senior appropriator’s need and the existence of a drought condition, the junior appropriator is in violation of the prior appropriation doctrine. The senior appropriator has the legal right to demand their full appropriation, and the State Water Commission can take action to enforce this right. The concept of “waste” is also important; water must be used efficiently, and any water intentionally or negligently wasted can be subject to forfeiture or reduction of the water right. In this scenario, the senior water right holder, having established their right prior to the junior user and facing a drought, is entitled to their full water allocation. The junior user’s continued diversion, knowing the senior right exists and in the face of scarcity, is an infringement upon the senior right.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use generally has a senior right to that water. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior rights holders receive any water. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law in North Dakota, meaning the water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or the user, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and it must be used efficiently. Abandonment of a water right can occur if a water user ceases to divert and use the water for a beneficial purpose for a statutory period, indicating an intent to relinquish the right. The State Water Commission plays a crucial role in administering water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. A permit is required to divert and use water, and the terms of the permit, including the amount of water and the beneficial use, are critical. If a junior appropriator continues to divert water despite a senior appropriator’s need and the existence of a drought condition, the junior appropriator is in violation of the prior appropriation doctrine. The senior appropriator has the legal right to demand their full appropriation, and the State Water Commission can take action to enforce this right. The concept of “waste” is also important; water must be used efficiently, and any water intentionally or negligently wasted can be subject to forfeiture or reduction of the water right. In this scenario, the senior water right holder, having established their right prior to the junior user and facing a drought, is entitled to their full water allocation. The junior user’s continued diversion, knowing the senior right exists and in the face of scarcity, is an infringement upon the senior right.
-
Question 17 of 30
17. Question
Consider a scenario in western North Dakota where a rancher, Ms. Elara Vance, was granted a water permit in 1975 to divert up to 100 acre-feet of water annually from the Little Missouri River for livestock watering and irrigation of pastureland. In 2010, a new industrial facility, “Dakota Energy Solutions,” received a permit to divert up to 500 acre-feet from the same river for its operations. During a severe drought in 2023, the river flow significantly decreased. Ms. Vance finds that her diversion is insufficient to water her livestock adequately. What is the fundamental legal principle that governs the priority of water use between Ms. Vance and Dakota Energy Solutions under North Dakota water law, and what is the likely outcome if Ms. Vance can demonstrate her water is not being delivered as per her permit?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This system dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use acquires a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to earlier ones. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law, meaning the water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or the user, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic supply, and must not be wasteful. The North Dakota State Water Commission is the primary administrative body responsible for granting, regulating, and adjudicating water rights. When considering a new appropriation, the Commission must ensure that granting the permit will not impair existing senior water rights. This involves assessing the availability of water in the source, the proposed rate and volume of diversion, the efficiency of the proposed use, and the potential impact on other users and the environment. The concept of “waste” is critical; water diverted must be used efficiently and not allowed to dissipate unnecessarily. A permit holder is entitled to the amount of water specified in their permit, subject to the condition that it is used for the designated beneficial purpose and that senior rights are not infringed upon. If a senior water right holder is not receiving their allocated water due to upstream diversions, they have the legal recourse to demand that junior users cease diversions until their senior right is satisfied. This prioritizes established rights over newer ones.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This system dictates that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use acquires a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to earlier ones. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law, meaning the water must be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public or the user, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic supply, and must not be wasteful. The North Dakota State Water Commission is the primary administrative body responsible for granting, regulating, and adjudicating water rights. When considering a new appropriation, the Commission must ensure that granting the permit will not impair existing senior water rights. This involves assessing the availability of water in the source, the proposed rate and volume of diversion, the efficiency of the proposed use, and the potential impact on other users and the environment. The concept of “waste” is critical; water diverted must be used efficiently and not allowed to dissipate unnecessarily. A permit holder is entitled to the amount of water specified in their permit, subject to the condition that it is used for the designated beneficial purpose and that senior rights are not infringed upon. If a senior water right holder is not receiving their allocated water due to upstream diversions, they have the legal recourse to demand that junior users cease diversions until their senior right is satisfied. This prioritizes established rights over newer ones.
-
Question 18 of 30
18. Question
Consider a scenario in western North Dakota where a rancher, Ms. Anya Sharma, obtained a water permit in 1975 to divert water from the Little Missouri River for irrigation. Her permit allows for a maximum diversion of 100 acre-feet per year. In 2015, Mr. Ben Carter secured a permit to divert water from the same river for a new industrial facility, with a priority date of 2015 and an allowed diversion of 50 acre-feet per year. During a severe drought in 2023, the river flow is significantly reduced. If the available water in the river for diversion is only 120 acre-feet for the entire year, what is the maximum amount of water Ms. Sharma can divert under North Dakota’s prior appropriation doctrine, assuming she is using her water for a beneficial use as per her permit?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, commonly referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use, and obtain a water permit, generally has a senior right to that water. When water becomes scarce, senior water rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior rights holders receive any. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in an arid or semi-arid climate like North Dakota, where water availability can fluctuate significantly. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Management Program within the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering these water rights. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, requiring that water be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and that it be used efficiently. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a period of five consecutive years, demonstrating intent to cease the beneficial use, as outlined in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water users are prohibited from wasting water, and any water that is wasted is not considered a beneficial use and can lead to forfeiture of the right. Therefore, a water user must continuously apply the water to a beneficial use to maintain their priority.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, commonly referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use, and obtain a water permit, generally has a senior right to that water. When water becomes scarce, senior water rights holders are entitled to receive their full allocation before junior rights holders receive any. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in an arid or semi-arid climate like North Dakota, where water availability can fluctuate significantly. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Management Program within the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering these water rights. Beneficial use is a cornerstone, requiring that water be used for a recognized purpose that benefits the public, such as agriculture, industry, or municipal supply, and that it be used efficiently. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a period of five consecutive years, demonstrating intent to cease the beneficial use, as outlined in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water users are prohibited from wasting water, and any water that is wasted is not considered a beneficial use and can lead to forfeiture of the right. Therefore, a water user must continuously apply the water to a beneficial use to maintain their priority.
-
Question 19 of 30
19. Question
Consider a scenario in North Dakota where a senior water right holder, established in 1905 for irrigation of 80 acres of farmland along the Missouri River, is experiencing significantly reduced flow during a prolonged drought. A junior water right holder, whose right was established in 1975 for industrial cooling purposes at a facility located upstream, is still able to draw sufficient water to meet its operational needs. Under North Dakota’s prior appropriation doctrine, what is the primary legal principle governing the allocation of water in this situation, and what is the role of the State Engineer in administering these rights during such a shortage?
Correct
North Dakota, like many Western states, operates under a prior appropriation water rights system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This system prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When water is scarce, senior rights holders, those who established their rights earlier, are entitled to receive their full allocation of water before junior rights holders receive any. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in arid and semi-arid regions where water availability can fluctuate significantly. The State Engineer is the administrative authority responsible for issuing, regulating, and adjudicating water rights within North Dakota. This role involves overseeing the appropriation process, ensuring compliance with water laws, and resolving disputes among water users. The concept of beneficial use is also central; water rights are granted for specific beneficial purposes, and the amount of water allocated is limited to what is reasonably required for that purpose. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a statutory period, indicating an intent to cease the beneficial use. The North Dakota Century Code, specifically Title 61, governs water rights and administration. The State Engineer’s authority extends to the administration of these rights during periods of shortage, ensuring that the priority system is maintained.
Incorrect
North Dakota, like many Western states, operates under a prior appropriation water rights system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This system prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When water is scarce, senior rights holders, those who established their rights earlier, are entitled to receive their full allocation of water before junior rights holders receive any. This principle is fundamental to managing water resources in arid and semi-arid regions where water availability can fluctuate significantly. The State Engineer is the administrative authority responsible for issuing, regulating, and adjudicating water rights within North Dakota. This role involves overseeing the appropriation process, ensuring compliance with water laws, and resolving disputes among water users. The concept of beneficial use is also central; water rights are granted for specific beneficial purposes, and the amount of water allocated is limited to what is reasonably required for that purpose. Abandonment of a water right can occur if the water is not used for a statutory period, indicating an intent to cease the beneficial use. The North Dakota Century Code, specifically Title 61, governs water rights and administration. The State Engineer’s authority extends to the administration of these rights during periods of shortage, ensuring that the priority system is maintained.
-
Question 20 of 30
20. Question
A farmer in Dunn County, North Dakota, acquired a water permit in 1975 to irrigate 100 acres of land from the Little Missouri River. In 2010, a new agricultural operation upstream obtained a permit to divert water for a larger irrigation project. Due to a severe drought in 2023, the river flow significantly decreased, impacting the water available for downstream users. The farmer from 1975 has not actively irrigated the full 100 acres for the past seven years, instead focusing on a smaller portion of the land due to changing crop patterns and economic factors, though they have continued to divert some water for the reduced acreage. What is the most likely legal status of the farmer’s water right in relation to the upstream operation during the 2023 drought, considering North Dakota’s water law principles?
Correct
North Dakota follows a system of prior appropriation for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use establishes a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to earlier ones. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full appropriation before junior rights holders receive any water. The State Water Commission, through the State Engineer, administers water rights in North Dakota. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, and water rights are granted for specific uses, such as irrigation, industrial purposes, municipal supply, or domestic use. If a water right is not exercised for a period of five consecutive years, it is considered abandoned, and the water may be available for appropriation by others. Abandonment is a critical aspect of maintaining water rights, ensuring that water resources are utilized efficiently. The North Dakota Century Code, particularly Chapter 61-04, outlines the procedures for water appropriation, adjudication, and the administration of water rights. A key principle is that water rights are appurtenant to the land for which they were granted, though this can vary depending on the specific terms of the permit and the nature of the use. The administration of these rights involves monitoring diversions, resolving disputes, and ensuring compliance with permit conditions.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows a system of prior appropriation for water rights, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use establishes a senior water right. Subsequent rights are junior to earlier ones. When water is scarce, senior rights holders are entitled to receive their full appropriation before junior rights holders receive any water. The State Water Commission, through the State Engineer, administers water rights in North Dakota. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, and water rights are granted for specific uses, such as irrigation, industrial purposes, municipal supply, or domestic use. If a water right is not exercised for a period of five consecutive years, it is considered abandoned, and the water may be available for appropriation by others. Abandonment is a critical aspect of maintaining water rights, ensuring that water resources are utilized efficiently. The North Dakota Century Code, particularly Chapter 61-04, outlines the procedures for water appropriation, adjudication, and the administration of water rights. A key principle is that water rights are appurtenant to the land for which they were granted, though this can vary depending on the specific terms of the permit and the nature of the use. The administration of these rights involves monitoring diversions, resolving disputes, and ensuring compliance with permit conditions.
-
Question 21 of 30
21. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who secured a water permit in 1975 to divert water from a tributary of the Little Missouri River for livestock watering and irrigation of 40 acres, now wishes to expand their operation to include a small commercial fish farm. The proposed fish farm would require a significantly larger volume of water than the current livestock and irrigation uses. The rancher plans to use the same diversion point but channel the water to a new set of ponds located on an adjacent parcel of land not covered by the original permit. What is the primary legal mechanism under North Dakota water law that the rancher must utilize to pursue this proposed expansion and new use of water?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use generally has a senior water right. Beneficial use is a key concept, defined by statute and interpreted by courts, encompassing uses such as agriculture, industry, domestic supply, and recreation. The State Engineer administers water rights, issuing permits for new appropriations and maintaining records of existing rights. A permit is a prerequisite for establishing a new water right. Water rights are appurtenant to the land for which they were granted and are not generally transferable to other locations or uses without a formal change in use application and approval by the State Engineer. This process ensures that changes in water use do not harm existing senior water rights holders. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water users are prohibited from wasting water, and the State Engineer can take action to prevent it. Furthermore, North Dakota law addresses existing rights at the time of statehood and the adjudication of water rights. The State Engineer is empowered to investigate and adjudicate all existing water rights to determine their priority, extent, and the nature of the use. This process aims to create a clear and definitive record of water rights within the state, promoting certainty and efficient water management.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use generally has a senior water right. Beneficial use is a key concept, defined by statute and interpreted by courts, encompassing uses such as agriculture, industry, domestic supply, and recreation. The State Engineer administers water rights, issuing permits for new appropriations and maintaining records of existing rights. A permit is a prerequisite for establishing a new water right. Water rights are appurtenant to the land for which they were granted and are not generally transferable to other locations or uses without a formal change in use application and approval by the State Engineer. This process ensures that changes in water use do not harm existing senior water rights holders. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water users are prohibited from wasting water, and the State Engineer can take action to prevent it. Furthermore, North Dakota law addresses existing rights at the time of statehood and the adjudication of water rights. The State Engineer is empowered to investigate and adjudicate all existing water rights to determine their priority, extent, and the nature of the use. This process aims to create a clear and definitive record of water rights within the state, promoting certainty and efficient water management.
-
Question 22 of 30
22. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, who holds a senior water permit for irrigation from the Little Missouri River, wishes to sell their water right to a new mining operation located several miles upstream. The mining operation intends to use the water for processing ore and dust suppression. The rancher’s permit allows for a diversion of \(100\) acre-feet per year, with a historical average annual diversion of \(85\) acre-feet. The proposed mining use would require \(95\) acre-feet annually, with the point of diversion remaining the same. What is the primary legal consideration the North Dakota State Engineer must evaluate when reviewing this transfer application to ensure compliance with state water law?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to divert and put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, the process involves several key considerations to ensure the transfer does not harm existing rights holders or the public interest. A proposed transfer of a water right from agricultural use to industrial use requires an application to the State Engineer. The State Engineer must review the application to determine if the proposed new use is a beneficial use and if the transfer will impair existing water rights. Impairment is typically assessed by examining the impact on downstream users who hold senior rights. If the transfer involves changing the point of diversion or the type of use, a thorough analysis of the historical water usage and the potential impact on the water source, especially during periods of scarcity, is crucial. North Dakota law, specifically under NDCC § 61-04-15, allows for the transfer of water rights, but it is subject to the condition that the transfer does not adversely affect other water users or the public welfare. The State Engineer has the authority to approve, deny, or approve with modifications the proposed transfer. The burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer will not cause impairment. This involves providing evidence of the historical use, the nature of the proposed use, and a plan to mitigate any potential negative impacts on the water resource and other users. The concept of “beneficial use” is central to all water rights in North Dakota and is defined broadly to include agricultural, domestic, industrial, and recreational purposes, among others. However, the quantification and prioritization of these uses are determined by the appropriation system.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to divert and put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, the process involves several key considerations to ensure the transfer does not harm existing rights holders or the public interest. A proposed transfer of a water right from agricultural use to industrial use requires an application to the State Engineer. The State Engineer must review the application to determine if the proposed new use is a beneficial use and if the transfer will impair existing water rights. Impairment is typically assessed by examining the impact on downstream users who hold senior rights. If the transfer involves changing the point of diversion or the type of use, a thorough analysis of the historical water usage and the potential impact on the water source, especially during periods of scarcity, is crucial. North Dakota law, specifically under NDCC § 61-04-15, allows for the transfer of water rights, but it is subject to the condition that the transfer does not adversely affect other water users or the public welfare. The State Engineer has the authority to approve, deny, or approve with modifications the proposed transfer. The burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer will not cause impairment. This involves providing evidence of the historical use, the nature of the proposed use, and a plan to mitigate any potential negative impacts on the water resource and other users. The concept of “beneficial use” is central to all water rights in North Dakota and is defined broadly to include agricultural, domestic, industrial, and recreational purposes, among others. However, the quantification and prioritization of these uses are determined by the appropriation system.
-
Question 23 of 30
23. Question
Consider a scenario where a rancher in western North Dakota, after securing a valid permit from the State Engineer for irrigation use from a tributary of the Little Missouri River, begins diverting water in 2018. A new agricultural enterprise, planning extensive crop cultivation, submits an application for a water permit from the same source in 2022, intending to divert a significantly larger volume of water. Assuming all other legal requirements for both parties are met, what is the foundational legal principle that dictates the priority of water use between the rancher and the new agricultural enterprise under North Dakota water law?
Correct
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights, meaning the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the superior right. This is often summarized as “first in time, first in right.” The State Engineer administers water rights under the direction of the State Water Commission. An application for a permit to appropriate water must be filed with the State Engineer. If the application is approved, a permit is issued, which is a prerequisite to acquiring a vested right. The permit specifies the amount of water, the source, the point of diversion, and the beneficial use. Beneficial use is a key concept, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and recreation, among others, as defined by North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04. The State Engineer reviews applications to ensure they do not impair existing water rights and that the proposed use is beneficial and in the public interest. A permit is not a guarantee of water availability, as rights are subject to natural conditions and the rights of senior appropriators. If a permit is granted, the permittee must then construct the diversion works and use the water as specified in the permit. Once the water is being used beneficially, the permittee can apply for a license to appropriate water, which then constitutes a vested right. The process emphasizes the historical development of water rights through appropriation and beneficial use, a fundamental principle in arid and semi-arid regions like North Dakota.
Incorrect
In North Dakota, the doctrine of prior appropriation governs water rights, meaning the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use has the superior right. This is often summarized as “first in time, first in right.” The State Engineer administers water rights under the direction of the State Water Commission. An application for a permit to appropriate water must be filed with the State Engineer. If the application is approved, a permit is issued, which is a prerequisite to acquiring a vested right. The permit specifies the amount of water, the source, the point of diversion, and the beneficial use. Beneficial use is a key concept, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and recreation, among others, as defined by North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04. The State Engineer reviews applications to ensure they do not impair existing water rights and that the proposed use is beneficial and in the public interest. A permit is not a guarantee of water availability, as rights are subject to natural conditions and the rights of senior appropriators. If a permit is granted, the permittee must then construct the diversion works and use the water as specified in the permit. Once the water is being used beneficially, the permittee can apply for a license to appropriate water, which then constitutes a vested right. The process emphasizes the historical development of water rights through appropriation and beneficial use, a fundamental principle in arid and semi-arid regions like North Dakota.
-
Question 24 of 30
24. Question
A landowner in western North Dakota, holding a valid water permit for irrigation from the Little Missouri River, wishes to transfer their point of diversion to a location upstream of their original intake, approximately 500 feet closer to the river’s source. This change is intended to reduce pumping costs due to a lower elevation. Several other water users hold permits downstream of the original diversion point. What is the primary legal consideration the North Dakota State Engineer must evaluate when reviewing this proposed change of point of diversion?
Correct
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to divert and put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, the State Engineer must approve the change to ensure it does not impair existing rights. This process involves an application for a change in point of diversion, place of use, or type of use. The State Engineer evaluates whether the proposed change would negatively impact other water users who hold prior or junior appropriations. If the change is approved, it is typically conditioned to protect existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, meaning the use must be reasonable and for a recognized purpose, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use. The impairment of existing rights is the primary legal hurdle for any proposed transfer or change in a water right in North Dakota. This principle is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the state’s water allocation system.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to divert and put water to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, the State Engineer must approve the change to ensure it does not impair existing rights. This process involves an application for a change in point of diversion, place of use, or type of use. The State Engineer evaluates whether the proposed change would negatively impact other water users who hold prior or junior appropriations. If the change is approved, it is typically conditioned to protect existing rights. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, meaning the use must be reasonable and for a recognized purpose, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use. The impairment of existing rights is the primary legal hurdle for any proposed transfer or change in a water right in North Dakota. This principle is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the state’s water allocation system.
-
Question 25 of 30
25. Question
A farmer in western North Dakota, holding a water permit established in 1975 for irrigation of 100 acres, observes a significant reduction in stream flow during a particularly dry summer. A new industrial facility upstream, which obtained its water permit in 1995 for processing operations, continues to divert water at its permitted rate. The farmer is concerned about the impact of the reduced stream flow on their ability to irrigate their crops. Under North Dakota’s water law principles, what is the most likely outcome regarding the farmer’s water supply in this scenario?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation water rights system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When a water permit is issued, it grants the holder the right to divert and use a specific quantity of water from a particular source, subject to the terms and conditions of the permit and the overall water availability. In times of scarcity, senior water rights holders, those with earlier established permits, have priority over junior rights holders. This means that junior users may have their diversions curtailed or cease entirely to ensure senior rights are met. The State Engineer is responsible for administering water rights, including issuing permits, adjudicating disputes, and enforcing regulations. The concept of beneficial use is central to the prior appropriation system; water rights are granted for specific, recognized beneficial uses, and the water must be used for that purpose. Failure to use water for its permitted beneficial use can lead to forfeiture of the right. The State Engineer can also issue temporary permits or emergency orders to manage water resources during periods of drought or other unusual conditions, but these actions must still align with the principles of prior appropriation and beneficial use. The State Engineer’s role is crucial in balancing the needs of existing water users with the protection of the state’s water resources for future use.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation water rights system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine prioritizes water rights based on the date of their establishment. When a water permit is issued, it grants the holder the right to divert and use a specific quantity of water from a particular source, subject to the terms and conditions of the permit and the overall water availability. In times of scarcity, senior water rights holders, those with earlier established permits, have priority over junior rights holders. This means that junior users may have their diversions curtailed or cease entirely to ensure senior rights are met. The State Engineer is responsible for administering water rights, including issuing permits, adjudicating disputes, and enforcing regulations. The concept of beneficial use is central to the prior appropriation system; water rights are granted for specific, recognized beneficial uses, and the water must be used for that purpose. Failure to use water for its permitted beneficial use can lead to forfeiture of the right. The State Engineer can also issue temporary permits or emergency orders to manage water resources during periods of drought or other unusual conditions, but these actions must still align with the principles of prior appropriation and beneficial use. The State Engineer’s role is crucial in balancing the needs of existing water users with the protection of the state’s water resources for future use.
-
Question 26 of 30
26. Question
In North Dakota, a farmer, Mr. Abernathy, who holds a valid water permit for irrigation from the Heart River, wishes to sell his water right to a new industrial facility planned near Bismarck. The industrial facility intends to use the water for cooling processes. The proposed transfer involves a change in the point of diversion and the type of beneficial use. What is the primary legal consideration the North Dakota State Engineer must evaluate when reviewing Mr. Abernathy’s proposed water right transfer, as per North Dakota water law principles?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use under a water permit has a senior right to that water compared to subsequent users. The State Engineer is responsible for administering water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. A water permit in North Dakota is a property right that can be bought, sold, or leased, but it is always subject to the terms and conditions of the permit and the overarching principles of beneficial use and the public interest. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, encompassing uses such as irrigation, municipal supply, industrial purposes, and domestic use, provided they are reasonable and not wasteful. When considering a transfer of a water right, the State Engineer must ensure that the proposed new use is also a beneficial use and that the transfer does not adversely affect the rights of other existing permit holders or the public interest. This includes assessing whether the transfer would diminish the water supply available to senior appropriators or negatively impact the environment. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04 governs water rights and administration, outlining the procedures for obtaining permits, making transfers, and resolving conflicts. The State Engineer has the authority to approve or deny water right transfers based on these statutory requirements and administrative rules.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use under a water permit has a senior right to that water compared to subsequent users. The State Engineer is responsible for administering water rights, issuing permits, and adjudicating disputes. A water permit in North Dakota is a property right that can be bought, sold, or leased, but it is always subject to the terms and conditions of the permit and the overarching principles of beneficial use and the public interest. The concept of “beneficial use” is central, encompassing uses such as irrigation, municipal supply, industrial purposes, and domestic use, provided they are reasonable and not wasteful. When considering a transfer of a water right, the State Engineer must ensure that the proposed new use is also a beneficial use and that the transfer does not adversely affect the rights of other existing permit holders or the public interest. This includes assessing whether the transfer would diminish the water supply available to senior appropriators or negatively impact the environment. North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04 governs water rights and administration, outlining the procedures for obtaining permits, making transfers, and resolving conflicts. The State Engineer has the authority to approve or deny water right transfers based on these statutory requirements and administrative rules.
-
Question 27 of 30
27. Question
Consider a scenario in North Dakota where a farmer, Ms. Anya Sharma, obtained a water permit in 1985 to irrigate 200 acres of land from the Missouri River. Her permit allows a maximum diversion of 5 cubic feet per second (cfs) for irrigation purposes, with a total annual diversion limit of 1000 acre-feet. In 2005, Mr. Ben Carter received a permit to divert water from the same river for industrial cooling, with a diversion limit of 3 cfs and an annual limit of 800 acre-feet. During a severe drought in 2023, the available flow in the Missouri River at their diversion points drops significantly. If the river flow is only sufficient to meet 75% of the permitted diversions for all users, how much water, in acre-feet per year, is Ms. Sharma entitled to divert under her senior water right, assuming she is using the water for a beneficial use as defined by North Dakota law and is not wasting any water?
Correct
North Dakota’s water law system is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use generally has the senior right to that water, even during times of scarcity. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s Office, administers water rights. A water permit is required to divert and use water from any natural stream or watercourse in North Dakota. These permits specify the amount of water that can be diverted, the source of the water, the point of diversion, the place of use, and the beneficial use for which the water is intended. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and stock watering. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water rights holders are obligated to use water efficiently and not allow it to be wasted. When a water right is established, it is quantified and prioritized. Senior rights holders are entitled to their full appropriation before junior rights holders can take any water during a shortage. This priority system is crucial for managing water resources during drought conditions or periods of high demand. The State Engineer has the authority to regulate the distribution of water to ensure that all valid water rights are respected according to their priority dates. Failure to comply with the terms of a water permit or the regulations of the State Engineer can lead to forfeiture or cancellation of the water right. The administration of these rights aims to balance the needs of various users while protecting the overall availability of water resources within the state.
Incorrect
North Dakota’s water law system is primarily based on the doctrine of prior appropriation, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use generally has the senior right to that water, even during times of scarcity. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s Office, administers water rights. A water permit is required to divert and use water from any natural stream or watercourse in North Dakota. These permits specify the amount of water that can be diverted, the source of the water, the point of diversion, the place of use, and the beneficial use for which the water is intended. Beneficial use is a cornerstone of water law, encompassing uses such as irrigation, domestic supply, industrial purposes, and stock watering. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water rights holders are obligated to use water efficiently and not allow it to be wasted. When a water right is established, it is quantified and prioritized. Senior rights holders are entitled to their full appropriation before junior rights holders can take any water during a shortage. This priority system is crucial for managing water resources during drought conditions or periods of high demand. The State Engineer has the authority to regulate the distribution of water to ensure that all valid water rights are respected according to their priority dates. Failure to comply with the terms of a water permit or the regulations of the State Engineer can lead to forfeiture or cancellation of the water right. The administration of these rights aims to balance the needs of various users while protecting the overall availability of water resources within the state.
-
Question 28 of 30
28. Question
A rancher in western North Dakota, operating under a valid water permit issued in 1985 for livestock watering and irrigation of 40 acres along the Little Missouri River, discovers that a new industrial development upstream is significantly reducing the flow during peak irrigation season. The rancher’s permit specifies a diversion of up to 2 cubic feet per second (cfs) for irrigation and a continuous flow of 0.1 cfs for livestock. The rancher has been diligently using the water for both purposes. The industrial development’s permit, issued in 2010, allows for a diversion of 5 cfs for processing operations, with no specific mention of return flows. The rancher believes their senior rights are being violated. Under North Dakota’s prior appropriation system, what is the most accurate legal basis for the rancher’s claim against the industrial development?
Correct
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation water law system, meaning that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, which governs the appropriation of water. The principle of “beneficial use” is central to this system, requiring that water be used for a purpose that is recognized as beneficial by the state, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering water rights. When considering a new appropriation, the state must ensure that granting the permit will not impair existing water rights. This involves an examination of the water source, the proposed use, and the potential impact on downstream users and the environment. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water must be used efficiently and not wasted. A valid appropriation typically involves filing an application with the state engineer, who then investigates the application, potentially holds hearings, and issues a permit if the appropriation is in the public interest and does not infringe upon existing rights. The permit specifies the amount of water, the point of diversion, and the beneficial use. Failure to use the water for the permitted purpose or to use it diligently can lead to forfeiture of the right. This framework prioritizes the efficient and orderly allocation of a limited resource.
Incorrect
North Dakota operates under a prior appropriation water law system, meaning that the first person to divert water and put it to beneficial use has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) Chapter 61-04, which governs the appropriation of water. The principle of “beneficial use” is central to this system, requiring that water be used for a purpose that is recognized as beneficial by the state, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use. The State Water Commission, now the Water Resource Division of the State Engineer’s office, is responsible for administering water rights. When considering a new appropriation, the state must ensure that granting the permit will not impair existing water rights. This involves an examination of the water source, the proposed use, and the potential impact on downstream users and the environment. The concept of “waste” is also critical; water must be used efficiently and not wasted. A valid appropriation typically involves filing an application with the state engineer, who then investigates the application, potentially holds hearings, and issues a permit if the appropriation is in the public interest and does not infringe upon existing rights. The permit specifies the amount of water, the point of diversion, and the beneficial use. Failure to use the water for the permitted purpose or to use it diligently can lead to forfeiture of the right. This framework prioritizes the efficient and orderly allocation of a limited resource.
-
Question 29 of 30
29. Question
Consider a scenario in the Missouri River basin in North Dakota where a rancher, Mr. Abernathy, secured a water permit in 1975 for irrigation of his pastureland. In 2005, a new industrial facility, PetroCorp, obtained a permit to use water for its processing operations. During a prolonged drought in 2023, the river flow significantly decreased. If PetroCorp’s diversion would prevent Mr. Abernathy from receiving his full permitted amount for his pasture, what is the most likely outcome under North Dakota’s water law principles?
Correct
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation water law system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use under a valid water permit has a senior right to that water. Subsequent permit holders have junior rights, meaning they can only use water after the senior rights have been satisfied. In times of scarcity, junior users must cease their diversions to allow senior users to obtain their full appropriation. Beneficial use is a key concept, requiring that water be used for a purpose recognized by law, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and that the use is not wasteful. The State Engineer is the administrative official responsible for issuing permits, regulating water use, and adjudicating water rights within North Dakota. Water rights are appurtenant to the land for which the permit was granted and are not considered ownership of the water itself, but rather the right to use it. The State Engineer’s office manages a public record of all water permits and diversions, ensuring transparency and adherence to the prior appropriation principles. The concept of “waste” is critical; any water diverted beyond what is reasonably necessary for the beneficial use, or water lost through inefficient practices, can be considered waste and may lead to a forfeiture of the water right.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation water law system, often referred to as “first in time, first in right.” This doctrine means that the first person to divert water and put it to a beneficial use under a valid water permit has a senior right to that water. Subsequent permit holders have junior rights, meaning they can only use water after the senior rights have been satisfied. In times of scarcity, junior users must cease their diversions to allow senior users to obtain their full appropriation. Beneficial use is a key concept, requiring that water be used for a purpose recognized by law, such as agriculture, industry, or domestic use, and that the use is not wasteful. The State Engineer is the administrative official responsible for issuing permits, regulating water use, and adjudicating water rights within North Dakota. Water rights are appurtenant to the land for which the permit was granted and are not considered ownership of the water itself, but rather the right to use it. The State Engineer’s office manages a public record of all water permits and diversions, ensuring transparency and adherence to the prior appropriation principles. The concept of “waste” is critical; any water diverted beyond what is reasonably necessary for the beneficial use, or water lost through inefficient practices, can be considered waste and may lead to a forfeiture of the water right.
-
Question 30 of 30
30. Question
A farmer in Emmons County, North Dakota, who holds a senior water permit to irrigate 100 acres from the James River, wishes to transfer a portion of their water right to a neighboring rancher for livestock watering. The proposed transfer would reduce the irrigated acreage to 75 acres. What is the primary legal consideration the North Dakota State Water Commission must evaluate before approving this transfer?
Correct
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to put water to beneficial use generally has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, several factors are paramount. The transfer must not harm existing senior water rights. This involves an assessment of the water source’s availability and the potential impact on downstream users who hold rights established earlier in time. The proposed new use must also be a beneficial use, as defined by state law, and must be adjudicated by the State Water Commission. The process typically involves an application for transfer, a review by the State Water Commission, and a public notice period to allow any potentially affected parties to raise objections. The commission then makes a determination based on the evidence presented and the applicable statutes. If the transfer is approved, it is typically issued as a new permit or a modification to an existing permit, with specific terms and conditions to ensure compliance with water law and protect other water users. The concept of “impairment” is central to the adjudication of water right transfers in North Dakota.
Incorrect
North Dakota follows a prior appropriation system for water rights, meaning the first to put water to beneficial use generally has the senior right. This system is codified in North Dakota Century Code Chapter 61-04. When considering the transfer of a water right, several factors are paramount. The transfer must not harm existing senior water rights. This involves an assessment of the water source’s availability and the potential impact on downstream users who hold rights established earlier in time. The proposed new use must also be a beneficial use, as defined by state law, and must be adjudicated by the State Water Commission. The process typically involves an application for transfer, a review by the State Water Commission, and a public notice period to allow any potentially affected parties to raise objections. The commission then makes a determination based on the evidence presented and the applicable statutes. If the transfer is approved, it is typically issued as a new permit or a modification to an existing permit, with specific terms and conditions to ensure compliance with water law and protect other water users. The concept of “impairment” is central to the adjudication of water right transfers in North Dakota.