Missouri law, specifically within the purview of the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and its Division of Aeronautics, outlines stringent requirements for the operation of aircraft within the state, particularly concerning the registration and licensing of aviation facilities. When an entity intends to establish or modify an airport, heliport, or landing strip within Missouri, a critical step involves obtaining the necessary approvals from the state. This process is designed to ensure public safety, efficient airspace utilization, and compliance with established aviation standards. The governing statutes, such as those found in Chapter 305 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, detail the procedures for airport zoning, licensing, and the establishment of public-use airports. The application for an airport license requires a comprehensive submission that includes site plans, operational procedures, and evidence of compliance with federal regulations, such as those promulgated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Furthermore, the state mandates specific safety standards that must be met before an airport can be licensed for public use. These standards are not merely procedural but are fundamental to the safe operation of aircraft and the protection of the public. The approval process involves a thorough review by MoDOT to ensure that the proposed facility aligns with the state’s overall aviation development plan and adheres to all applicable safety and operational regulations. Failure to secure this state-level licensing can result in significant penalties and the inability to legally operate the facility for public aviation purposes within Missouri. The intent is to create a regulated environment that fosters safe and sustainable aviation growth.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division is responsible for overseeing aviation safety and development within the state. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically sections concerning airport zoning and land use, grants the state and its political subdivisions the authority to enact regulations to protect navigable airspace and promote safe airport operations. When a proposed construction project near an airport might interfere with safe flight operations, the relevant state or local authority, often in coordination with MoDOT, will review the project. The primary concern is the potential obstruction of navigable airspace, which is defined by federal and state regulations. Missouri law, in line with federal standards, establishes clear height limitations and notification requirements for structures that could pose a hazard to aircraft. These regulations are designed to prevent the creation of obstructions that would require a deviation from established airways or create a significant risk to pilots. The process typically involves submitting plans for review to determine compliance with these established safety standards. The authority to regulate such structures stems from the state’s police power to protect public safety and welfare, extended to the aviation domain.

The scenario describes an aircraft operating under Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) that is equipped with an experimental amateur-built aircraft designation. When operating such an aircraft, specific limitations apply regarding its use for compensation or hire, and for carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. Missouri law, like federal regulations, generally prohibits the use of experimental aircraft for commercial purposes. Specifically, an experimental amateur-built aircraft, unless it meets the criteria for a light-sport aircraft and is operated in accordance with applicable LSA rules, cannot be used for hire. The question probes the understanding of these restrictions. The core principle is that the experimental category is for recreation, education, or design and construction testing, not for commercial aviation operations that would typically be conducted by certified aircraft. Therefore, the prohibition against carrying passengers for compensation or hire is a fundamental aspect of operating an experimental amateur-built aircraft in Missouri, consistent with federal mandates.

Missouri law, specifically within the framework of Chapter 305 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, addresses the regulation of aviation activities to ensure public safety and promote the orderly development of air commerce. A key aspect of this regulation involves the registration and identification of aircraft operating within the state. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for the primary registration of aircraft in the United States, state laws often impose additional requirements or address specific nuances pertinent to intrastate operations or the state’s regulatory oversight. Missouri statutes generally require that aircraft operated within the state, particularly those engaged in commercial operations or based within Missouri, be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). This registration process is distinct from federal registration and serves purposes such as taxation, accident reporting, and the enforcement of state aviation laws. The specific details of this registration, including fees, renewal periods, and exemptions, are outlined in the statutes. For instance, Missouri Revised Statutes Section 305.190 mandates that all aircraft based in Missouri and operated within the state, unless specifically exempted, must be registered. This registration is typically an annual requirement. Understanding the scope of this state-level registration is crucial for pilots and aircraft owners operating in Missouri, as non-compliance can lead to penalties. The law aims to maintain a comprehensive registry for aircraft within Missouri’s jurisdiction, facilitating state-level aviation management and safety initiatives.

Missouri law, specifically within the purview of the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and the Missouri Aviation Section, governs the registration and operation of aircraft within the state. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sets broad standards for airworthiness and pilot licensing, state laws often address specific aspects like aircraft registration, taxation, and the establishment and maintenance of public-use airports. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, “Aircraft and Airports,” outlines many of these state-specific regulations. For example, Section 305.200 mandates that all aircraft based in Missouri must be registered with the state unless they are registered with another state or are exempt under federal law. Aircraft registration in Missouri is typically tied to the aircraft’s primary basing location. This registration process is distinct from FAA registration, which is primarily for ownership and identification purposes on a national level. The state registration is crucial for enabling the state to track aircraft operating within its borders and to potentially levy certain taxes or fees, contributing to the upkeep of aviation infrastructure. Understanding the difference between federal and state registration requirements is paramount for aircraft owners and operators based in Missouri. The state’s interest in registration stems from its responsibility to promote aviation safety and economic development related to aviation within its jurisdiction.

The Missouri Aviation Safety and Security Act, as codified in RSMo Chapter 305, outlines specific responsibilities for airport operators and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) regarding the maintenance and operation of public-use airports within the state. Section 305.200 specifically addresses the duties of airport owners and operators. This section mandates that owners and operators of public-use airports shall maintain their airports in a condition that is safe for the landing and takeoff of aircraft and shall comply with all rules and regulations promulgated by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Missouri Department of Transportation. This includes ensuring that runways, taxiways, and aprons are free from obstructions, properly marked, and adequately lit, as well as maintaining navigational aids. Furthermore, airport operators are responsible for ensuring that all aeronautical activities conducted on the airport are carried out in a safe manner. The question asks about the primary responsibility of an airport operator concerning safety. While ensuring compliance with federal regulations is a key component, the overarching duty is to maintain the airport in a condition safe for aircraft operations. This encompasses more than just adhering to FAA rules; it involves active management and upkeep of the physical infrastructure and operational procedures to prevent hazards. Therefore, maintaining the airport in a condition safe for landing and takeoff of aircraft is the most direct and fundamental safety responsibility.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees aviation safety and development within the state. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 outlines the powers and duties of the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission regarding aeronautics. Specifically, Section 305.190 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that all aircraft based in Missouri and operated within the state must be registered with the state aviation authority unless specifically exempted. Exemptions typically apply to aircraft operated under a valid airworthiness certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that are not based in Missouri, or aircraft operated exclusively in foreign air commerce. For an aircraft to be considered “based” in Missouri, it implies a primary location of operation or storage within the state for a significant period, typically exceeding 90 consecutive days. Therefore, an aircraft owned by a Missouri resident and primarily hangared at a Missouri airport for the entire year would be subject to registration requirements, assuming no specific exemption applies. The registration process ensures compliance with state aviation regulations and aids in the identification and tracking of aircraft operating within Missouri’s airspace.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees the state’s aviation system. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 governs aeronautics within the state. Specifically, Section 305.170 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires any aircraft based in Missouri for more than 60 consecutive days to be registered with the state, unless it is already registered in another state and is not based in Missouri. Aircraft owned by non-residents and temporarily based in Missouri for less than 60 days are exempt from this registration requirement. The question asks about the registration obligation for an aircraft that has been continuously operated from a private airstrip in Missouri for 75 days by its owner, who resides in Kansas. Since the aircraft has been based in Missouri for longer than the 60-day threshold and is operated from a Missouri location, it falls under the registration requirement of Missouri Revised Statutes Section 305.170, irrespective of the owner’s residency, as the basis of operation is the determining factor for state registration when exceeding the statutory period.

Missouri law, specifically concerning aviation, often involves the state’s role in regulating airspace and airport operations within its borders, complementing federal regulations. When considering the establishment of new public-use airports or significant modifications to existing ones, Missouri statutes require a thorough review process. This process is designed to ensure public safety, environmental protection, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), through its Aeronautics Division, typically oversees this process. A key component of this oversight involves the consideration of economic feasibility and the potential impact on existing aviation infrastructure and communities. The law emphasizes that any new airport development must demonstrate a clear public benefit and adhere to specific planning and zoning guidelines. While federal agencies like the FAA provide extensive guidance and funding, state-level approval is often a prerequisite for projects seeking state or local support and is crucial for ensuring compliance with Missouri’s unique land use and environmental considerations. The question tests the understanding of the state’s authority in airport development, focusing on the procedural and substantive requirements mandated by Missouri law for such projects, which includes a comprehensive review of their impact and necessity.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically concerning aeronautics and aviation, outlines the regulatory framework for aviation activities within the state. Section 305.170 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Missouri, or operated within the state in a manner that suggests it is based there, must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). The purpose of this registration is to ensure accountability, facilitate the tracking of aircraft for safety and regulatory purposes, and to generate revenue for aviation infrastructure development. The statute defines “based” as an aircraft’s principal location of operation or storage for a period exceeding 90 consecutive days. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can result in penalties, including fines and the prohibition of further operation within Missouri. Therefore, an aircraft that has been continuously stored and operated from a private airstrip in Springfield, Missouri, for over a year would be subject to Missouri’s aircraft registration requirements, as it clearly meets the criteria for being based in the state.

Missouri law, specifically under Chapter 305 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, addresses the regulation of aeronautics within the state. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) holds primary authority over airspace and aircraft safety nationwide, Missouri statutes provide for state-level oversight and regulation of aviation activities that occur within its borders. This includes provisions for the registration of aircraft, licensing of pilots and mechanics, and the establishment and operation of airports. The Missouri Department of Transportation, through its Aeronautics Division, is typically the state agency responsible for administering and enforcing these laws. The statutes also cover aspects like airport zoning, liability for damages caused by aircraft, and the prohibition of reckless flying. Understanding the interplay between federal and state aviation laws is crucial for anyone operating aircraft or aviation facilities in Missouri. Specifically, the state’s authority is generally limited to areas not preempted by federal law, focusing on intrastate operations, airport development, and public safety within the state. Therefore, while federal regulations dictate many operational aspects, Missouri law provides a framework for state-specific aviation governance and infrastructure.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically concerning aviation, outlines the regulatory framework for aviation activities within the state. Section 305.190 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that all aircraft based in Missouri, unless specifically exempted, must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The purpose of this registration is to provide a mechanism for identifying aircraft operating within the state, ensuring compliance with safety standards, and for taxation purposes. Aircraft that are merely passing through Missouri airspace or are temporarily located within the state without being based there are generally not subject to Missouri’s registration requirements. The concept of “based” is crucial here; it typically refers to the state where the aircraft is habitually kept or operated from. This distinguishes it from transient aircraft. Therefore, an aircraft that has its primary operational situs or home base in Missouri is subject to registration under Missouri law, irrespective of its ownership’s domicile. The statute also details the fees associated with registration and the process for renewal, emphasizing the state’s authority to regulate aircraft operating within its jurisdiction.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees aviation safety and development within the state. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 outlines various regulations pertaining to aviation. Specifically, Section 305.170 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires any aircraft based in Missouri for more than 60 consecutive days, or which has its permanent station in Missouri, to be registered with the state. The registration is typically an annual process. The purpose of this registration is to ensure accountability, aid in accident investigation, and potentially contribute to aviation infrastructure funding through fees. Failure to comply with registration requirements can result in penalties, including fines and potential grounding of the aircraft until compliance is achieved. Understanding the specifics of when an aircraft is considered “based” or has its “permanent station” in Missouri is crucial for compliance, as these terms are interpreted by MoDOT to encompass more than just physical presence, considering factors like operational base and intent of use within the state.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees the state’s aeronautical infrastructure. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically sections concerning airport development and operations, outlines the framework for state involvement. When a municipality or airport authority in Missouri seeks to develop or improve an airport, particularly with federal funding such as Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants, state oversight is often required. This oversight ensures compliance with state aviation standards, environmental regulations, and land use compatibility. MoDOT’s role includes reviewing project plans, ensuring proper environmental assessments are conducted, and verifying that the project aligns with the Missouri Airport System Plan. The statute grants MoDOT the authority to approve or deny applications for state aid and to set conditions for airport development projects that utilize state or federal funds administered through the state. Therefore, any municipality planning an airport expansion that requires state approval or involves state funding, even if primarily federally funded, must engage with MoDOT for project authorization. This is to ensure the project meets Missouri’s specific aviation needs and regulatory requirements, maintaining a consistent standard across the state’s aviation network.

Missouri law, specifically within Chapter 305 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, governs aviation activities within the state. When an aircraft is involved in an accident that results in fatalities or serious injuries, or significant property damage, the operator or owner is obligated to report the incident. This reporting requirement is crucial for accident investigation, safety analysis, and potential regulatory action. The relevant statute outlines the timeframe and the authority to whom such reports must be made. While federal regulations under the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) also mandate accident reporting, state laws can impose additional or concurrent requirements. In Missouri, the Director of the Department of Transportation is the designated state official responsible for receiving these reports. The law aims to ensure prompt notification to facilitate timely response and investigation, contributing to the overall safety of aviation operations within Missouri. The specific trigger for reporting includes any accident involving an aircraft that causes death, serious injury, or substantial damage to the aircraft or other property. The obligation to report falls upon the pilot in command, or if the pilot is incapacitated, the owner or operator of the aircraft. This proactive reporting mechanism is a cornerstone of aviation safety oversight at the state level.

The question revolves around the jurisdictional authority and operational requirements for non-certificated air carriers operating within Missouri, specifically concerning intrastate flights that do not involve interstate commerce. Missouri law, like federal aviation law, distinguishes between operations that are purely intrastate and those that fall under federal purview. For intrastate operations not otherwise regulated by federal statutes or regulations, the State of Missouri, through its Department of Transportation or equivalent aviation authority, may establish its own requirements. These can include registration, pilot licensing endorsements, aircraft airworthiness standards that meet or exceed federal minimums for similar operations, and insurance mandates to protect the public. The concept of “public convenience and necessity” is a common regulatory standard in transportation, often applied to determine if a new service should be permitted, and it requires an applicant to demonstrate a need for the service and their ability to provide it safely and reliably. Without a federal certificate of public convenience and necessity, an operator engaging in intrastate commercial air transport within Missouri would typically need to satisfy state-level economic and safety regulations. These state-level regulations are designed to ensure public safety and fair competition within the state’s borders for operations that are not exclusively governed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for interstate or international purposes. The ability of a state to regulate intrastate aviation is generally recognized, provided such regulations do not conflict with federal authority or impose an undue burden on interstate commerce. Therefore, a carrier must seek approval that addresses both the economic aspect (public convenience and necessity) and the safety aspect of its intrastate operations within Missouri.

The scenario involves a drone operator in Missouri who has obtained a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate and is operating a drone for commercial purposes. The question pertains to the specific state-level regulations in Missouri that might apply to this operation, beyond the federal FAA rules. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically sections related to aeronautics, govern aviation within the state. While the FAA has exclusive authority over airspace and aircraft safety, states can regulate aspects of drone use that do not conflict with federal law, such as privacy, trespass, and certain operational restrictions on state property or within specific local jurisdictions. However, the core operational requirements for commercial drone flight, including pilot certification, aircraft registration, and general operating rules like visual line of sight and altitude limits, are federally preempted and enforced by the FAA under Part 107. Therefore, a Part 107 certificate is the primary federal authorization required. Missouri law does not mandate an additional state-specific pilot license or registration for drone operators holding a valid Part 107 certificate for commercial operations. The focus remains on compliance with federal regulations for the operational aspects, while state laws may impose additional responsibilities concerning property rights and public safety not directly related to the act of piloting the aircraft itself.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division is responsible for the oversight and development of aviation within the state. This includes enforcing regulations related to airport safety, aeronautical land use, and pilot conduct within Missouri’s airspace. Missouri Revised Statutes, Chapter 305, specifically addresses aviation and airport regulations. Section 305.170 outlines the powers and duties of the department concerning aeronautics. This statute grants MoDOT the authority to adopt and enforce rules and regulations for the safe and efficient conduct of aeronautics in the state. Among these powers is the ability to prescribe regulations for the licensing of airports and the certification of aeronautical activities that may impact public safety or the environment. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has primary jurisdiction over national airspace and aircraft operations, state aviation agencies like MoDOT have the authority to regulate intrastate aviation activities and airport operations that fall within their purview, particularly concerning land use and safety standards not preempted by federal law. Therefore, MoDOT’s role in licensing airports and ensuring compliance with state aviation laws is a direct application of its statutory mandate to promote and regulate aviation safety and development within Missouri.

The scenario involves an aircraft operating under Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) within Missouri. The question pertains to the requirement for a pilot to have a current medical certificate. Under FAR \(61.23(a)(2)\), a pilot must have a current medical certificate to fly an aircraft for compensation or hire, or to act as pilot in command of an aircraft carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. However, for operations not for compensation or hire, such as recreational flying, a pilot may operate under the conditions specified in FAR \(61.23(a)(3)\) or \(61.23(a)(4)\). Specifically, FAR \(61.23(a)(3)\) allows a pilot to act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying a person other than the pilot, provided the pilot is in command of an aircraft which is not carrying any passengers, and the aircraft is certificated for operations with a maximum certificated altitude of not more than 14,000 feet mean sea level (MSL), and the pilot has at least a private pilot certificate. FAR \(61.23(a)(4)\) allows a pilot to act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying a person other than the pilot, provided the pilot is in command of an aircraft which is not carrying any passengers, and the aircraft is certificated for operations with a maximum certificated altitude of not more than 14,000 feet MSL, and the pilot has at least a private pilot certificate. Therefore, if the flight is purely for personal transportation and not for hire or compensation, and the aircraft’s operating limitations do not exceed 14,000 feet MSL, the pilot may not need a current medical certificate if they meet the specific requirements of the BasicMed provisions or the exemption under FAR \(61.23(a)(3)\) or \(61.23(a)(4)\). The question specifically asks about a flight for personal transportation, not for hire or compensation, and implies the aircraft is within the altitude limitations. Thus, the pilot may be able to operate without a traditional FAA medical certificate if they comply with BasicMed or other applicable exemptions. The correct answer hinges on the understanding that not all private pilot operations require a current FAA medical certificate if specific conditions, like those under BasicMed or the recreational flying exemption, are met.

Missouri law, specifically within the purview of the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and its Aviation Division, addresses the registration and operation of aircraft within the state. While federal regulations under the FAA govern the overarching safety and airworthiness of aircraft, state laws often supplement these by focusing on aspects like registration, taxation, and specific operational rules pertinent to the state’s unique airspace and aviation infrastructure. For instance, Missouri Revised Statutes (RSMo) Chapter 305, concerning Aeronautics, outlines requirements for aircraft registration. These statutes typically mandate that any aircraft based in Missouri and operated within the state must be registered with the state aviation authority. The registration process involves providing specific aircraft details, proof of ownership, and payment of applicable fees. Failure to comply with these state registration requirements can result in penalties, including fines and potential operational restrictions. The underlying principle is to provide the state with a mechanism to track aircraft operating within its borders, facilitate aviation planning, and ensure compliance with state-specific aviation mandates, complementing federal oversight without duplicating it. Understanding the distinction between federal and state authority is crucial; federal law governs airworthiness and pilot licensing, while state law often focuses on the administrative and operational aspects within the state’s jurisdiction, such as registration for aircraft based within Missouri.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically concerning aviation, outlines the framework for aircraft registration and operation within the state. While federal regulations under the FAA govern aircraft airworthiness and pilot licensing, Missouri law addresses intrastate aspects. For instance, Missouri law requires aircraft operating within the state to be registered if they are based in Missouri or used in intrastate commerce. The specific requirement for registration is tied to the aircraft’s operational base or its use for hire within the state. An aircraft that is merely passing through Missouri airspace, or is temporarily based there for maintenance without engaging in intrastate operations, may not necessitate Missouri registration. The determination hinges on the intent and nature of the aircraft’s presence and activity within Missouri’s jurisdiction. Therefore, an aircraft primarily based in Kansas and only occasionally landing in Missouri for non-commercial purposes, such as visiting a private airstrip, would not be subject to Missouri aircraft registration requirements under these statutes.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 governs aviation. Specifically, Section 305.160 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires that any aircraft based in Missouri and owned by a resident of Missouri must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). The registration is valid for a period of one year from the date of issuance. Failure to register an aircraft based in Missouri can result in penalties, including fines. The statute emphasizes the state’s interest in regulating aviation activities within its borders for safety and administrative purposes. Registration facilitates the identification of aircraft operating within the state and ensures compliance with aviation laws. The process typically involves submitting an application form, proof of ownership, and the applicable registration fee to MoDOT. The law aims to provide a framework for the orderly and safe operation of aircraft within Missouri, aligning with federal regulations while addressing state-specific concerns. The concept of “based in Missouri” refers to the location where the aircraft is customarily kept or operated.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 governs aviation. Specifically, Section 305.200 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute requires that any aircraft owned or operated within Missouri, unless specifically exempted, must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The registration process involves submitting an application, paying a fee, and providing proof of ownership and airworthiness. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can result in penalties, including fines and potential impoundment of the aircraft. The purpose of this registration is to provide a mechanism for identifying aircraft operating within the state, ensuring compliance with aviation laws, and assisting in accident investigations or enforcement actions. The statute also outlines exemptions, such as for aircraft registered in other states and only temporarily in Missouri, or for certain types of aircraft used for specific purposes. However, for aircraft based in Missouri and regularly operated within its airspace, registration is a mandatory prerequisite.

The scenario involves a commercial pilot operating a multi-engine aircraft for hire within Missouri airspace. The pilot has obtained a new FAA Airman Certificate with a Class B endorsement for a specific aircraft type. Missouri aviation regulations, specifically those pertaining to the operation of aircraft for compensation or hire, often mirror or supplement federal requirements. The question probes the pilot’s understanding of the necessary endorsements and ratings for such operations under Missouri law, considering that federal regulations (like 14 CFR Part 61) dictate the fundamental requirements for pilot certification and endorsements. While the FAA Airman Certificate is the primary document, state aviation laws may impose additional requirements or interpretations. In Missouri, as in many states, operating for hire necessitates a commercial pilot certificate and the specific aircraft type rating, which is typically indicated by an endorsement on the certificate. The question tests the understanding that the FAA endorsement for a specific aircraft type is the crucial element for legal operation of that aircraft for hire, assuming all other federal and state operational requirements are met. The existence of a valid FAA Commercial Pilot Certificate with the appropriate class and type rating (in this case, evidenced by the new endorsement) is the direct legal authority for such operations within Missouri. Therefore, the presence of this endorsement on the pilot’s FAA certificate is the critical factor.

Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 governs aviation. Specifically, Section 305.170 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Missouri and operated within the state must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation. Aircraft based in Missouri are defined as those whose principal base of operations is within the state. Registration is an annual requirement and involves submitting an application along with a fee. The purpose of this registration is to provide a mechanism for identifying aircraft operating within the state, aiding in safety, enforcement, and statistical tracking of aviation activities. Failure to register an aircraft that is based in Missouri and operated within its airspace can result in penalties, including fines. The statute is designed to ensure that all aircraft operating within Missouri’s jurisdiction are accounted for, contributing to the overall safety and regulatory framework of aviation within the state, aligning with federal regulations while establishing state-specific requirements for aircraft based within its borders.

The Missouri Aviation Code, specifically Chapter 305, addresses the regulation of aircraft and aviation activities within the state. Section 305.170 of the Missouri Revised Statutes outlines the requirements for aircraft registration. This statute mandates that all aircraft operated within Missouri, unless specifically exempted, must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The registration process ensures that aircraft operating within the state are properly identified and that the state has a record of aviation assets. Exemptions typically apply to aircraft operated under federal regulations that preempt state registration, such as those operated by the U.S. military or certain foreign-registered aircraft temporarily in the state. The core principle is that any aircraft engaged in intrastate commerce or general aviation use within Missouri’s airspace is subject to its registration requirements. Therefore, an aircraft based in Missouri and used for private recreational purposes would indeed require state registration.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees aviation safety and development within the state. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305, specifically sections related to aeronautics, govern aviation activities. A key aspect of this legislation is the regulation of aircraft registration and pilot licensing within the state’s jurisdiction. While federal regulations from the FAA establish baseline requirements for pilot certification and aircraft airworthiness, Missouri law may impose additional or specific requirements for operations conducted within the state, particularly concerning intrastate flights or operations at state-funded airports. The question probes the understanding of where an individual would typically seek specific Missouri aviation regulations, distinguishing between federal authority and state-level oversight. Missouri’s aviation laws, codified in its statutes, are administered and enforced by state agencies, such as MoDOT. Therefore, for specific Missouri aviation legal requirements not preempted by federal law, the primary source of information and regulatory authority would be the state’s legislative code and the administrative rules promulgated by its aviation agency.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees the state’s aviation system. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 outlines various aspects of aviation law within the state. Specifically, regarding airport development and funding, MoDOT has a role in approving airport layout plans and ensuring compliance with state and federal standards. When a municipality or airport authority proposes significant changes to an existing airport’s infrastructure, such as the construction of a new terminal building or runway extension, the process typically involves a review and approval by the state aviation authority. This ensures that the development aligns with the state’s master plan for aviation, promotes safety, and potentially qualifies for state or federal grants. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provides extensive oversight and funding for airport projects, state aviation agencies like MoDOT’s Aviation Division play a crucial role in state-specific planning, land use compatibility, and the administration of state aeronautical funds. Therefore, seeking approval from MoDOT for substantial airport development projects is a necessary step in Missouri, even when federal approval is also required.

Missouri Revised Statutes Section 305.180 addresses the registration of aircraft. This statute mandates that any aircraft based in Missouri must be registered with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The registration is required annually. The statute outlines specific information that must be provided during the registration process, including details about the aircraft’s make, model, serial number, and ownership. Furthermore, it specifies the fees associated with registration. Failure to comply with this registration requirement can result in penalties. The concept of “based in Missouri” is crucial; it generally refers to the location where the aircraft is habitually kept or operated. This requirement is distinct from federal registration with the FAA, which is also mandatory but serves a different regulatory purpose. The state registration aims to track aircraft within Missouri for purposes such as taxation, accident reporting, and general oversight of aviation activities within the state’s jurisdiction. Understanding the nuances of “based in” versus simply operating within the state is key to correctly applying this law.

The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Aviation Division oversees various aspects of aviation within the state, including the registration and licensing of aircraft operating within Missouri. Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 305 details the requirements for aircraft registration. Specifically, section 305.030 mandates that all aircraft based in Missouri must be registered annually. This registration process is crucial for maintaining accurate records of aircraft operating within the state, ensuring compliance with safety standards, and facilitating aviation planning. The registration fee is determined by the aircraft’s weight, as outlined in the statute. Failure to register an aircraft based in Missouri can result in penalties, including fines. The core principle is that any aircraft whose primary operational base is within Missouri is subject to its registration requirements, regardless of where it is physically located at any given moment, as long as it is based there. This ensures that all aircraft contributing to the state’s aviation infrastructure and economy are accounted for and comply with state regulations.