The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.150 to 383.190, outlines the framework for the protection of archaeological sites and historical resources within the state. This legislation establishes the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) as the primary authority for administering these protections. A key component of this framework is the requirement for state and local agencies to consult with the SHPO regarding any proposed undertaking that might affect properties listed on or eligible for the State Register of Historic Places. NRS 383.157 mandates that agencies must notify the SHPO of proposed undertakings and provide sufficient information for an assessment of potential impact. The SHPO then has a defined period to review the proposal and recommend mitigation measures if adverse effects are anticipated. Failure to consult adequately or to implement agreed-upon mitigation can result in penalties. The question probes the understanding of this consultation process, specifically focusing on the initial notification and the role of the SHPO as the designated state official responsible for historic preservation matters. The correct response hinges on identifying the specific statutory obligation of agencies to inform the SHPO about undertakings that could impact state-listed historic properties.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.130, outlines the responsibilities of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (NSHPO) concerning cultural resource management. This statute mandates the establishment and maintenance of a statewide cultural resource inventory, often referred to as the State Register of Historic Places and the Nevada Cultural Resource Information System (NVCRIS). The SHPO is tasked with coordinating with federal agencies, state agencies, and local governments to identify, evaluate, and protect historic properties. This includes conducting surveys, reviewing proposed undertakings that may affect historic properties, and providing technical assistance. The concept of “cultural resource management” in Nevada law encompasses a proactive approach to ensuring that the state’s historical and archaeological heritage is preserved, documented, and considered in land-use planning and development. This involves a systematic process of identifying potentially significant resources, assessing their eligibility for inclusion in historic registers, and developing mitigation strategies when adverse effects are unavoidable. The NSHPO plays a crucial role in this process by providing expertise, guidance, and oversight to ensure compliance with state and federal preservation laws, such as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as it applies to projects within Nevada.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, “Nevada Historical and Antiquities Preservation,” outlines the framework for protecting cultural and historical resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.160 addresses the criteria for determining if a property or site qualifies for designation as a Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Landmark or Historic District. This statute emphasizes that such designations are based on significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history, or that possess significant artistic or architectural value, or that have the potential to yield significant information important to history or prehistory. The statute also mandates that the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer, in consultation with the Nevada State Historic Preservation Advisory Council, makes these determinations. The process involves nomination, review, and potential public hearings. The core of the determination rests on the established criteria of historical, architectural, archaeological, engineering, or cultural significance, and association with significant historical events or persons, or possessing exceptional artistic or architectural merit, or offering substantial potential to yield important historical or prehistoric information. This comprehensive approach ensures that only sites meeting rigorous standards are afforded state-level protection and recognition, aligning with the broader goals of cultural resource management in Nevada.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically concerning the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and historical resources, outlines the procedures and responsibilities for state agencies and private entities. Under NRS 383.160, any person who discovers or knows of the existence of an archaeological site or historical artifact on public land and fails to report it to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or the State Museum is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statute emphasizes the importance of reporting such discoveries to ensure proper management and protection. Therefore, if a construction company excavating on state land in Nevada unearths human remains and artifacts believed to be over 100 years old, the immediate legal obligation is to cease work in the immediate vicinity and report the discovery to the designated state authorities. The failure to report, as stipulated in NRS 383.160, constitutes a misdemeanor. The prompt implies a scenario where a discovery is made, and the question asks about the *initial* legal obligation. The most direct and immediate legal requirement is the reporting of the discovery to the appropriate state officials. Other actions, such as the involvement of law enforcement or the State Historic Preservation Officer’s investigation, are subsequent steps that follow the initial report. The key is understanding the statutory duty to inform the state upon discovery.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, concerning the preservation of historical sites and artifacts, outlines the responsibilities and procedures for managing cultural resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.160 addresses the notification requirements when proposed actions might affect historic properties. This statute mandates that any person, including governmental agencies and private developers, who plans to undertake an activity that could potentially impact a historic property listed on or eligible for the State Register of Historic Places must notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The purpose of this notification is to allow the SHPO to assess the potential impact and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. Failure to provide this notification can result in penalties. The scenario describes a private archaeological survey that uncovers potential Native American burial sites. While the survey itself is a preparatory step, the discovery triggers the obligation to report such findings to the appropriate state authorities to ensure compliance with cultural heritage laws. The Nevada State Museum, through its historical and archaeological divisions, often acts as a liaison or direct recipient of such notifications, working in conjunction with the SHPO to manage these discoveries in accordance with state and federal laws, such as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and Nevada’s own heritage protection statutes. Therefore, the most appropriate initial action for the survey team, upon discovering potential human remains and associated artifacts, is to cease further disturbance and report the findings to the Nevada State Museum.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383 governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and historical resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.160 addresses the permitting process for archaeological investigations. This statute mandates that any person wishing to conduct archaeological investigations on state land, or on land managed by state agencies, must obtain a permit from the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The permit application process requires detailed information about the proposed project, including its objectives, methodology, the qualifications of the principal investigator, and a plan for the curation of any recovered artifacts and data. The SHPO reviews these applications to ensure compliance with state laws and professional archaeological standards, thereby safeguarding Nevada’s cultural heritage from unauthorized disturbance and ensuring that scientific research is conducted responsibly. The core principle is that all systematic archaeological work on state-controlled lands requires prior authorization to prevent looting, vandalism, and the destruction of contextually significant materials.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383 outlines the framework for the protection of cultural resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.160 mandates the establishment of a State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and details its responsibilities, including the nomination of properties to the State Register of Historic Places and the National Register of Historic Places. The process for nominating a property to the State Register involves a formal application, review by the State Historic Preservation Officer, and consideration by the Nevada State Historic Preservation Board. This board, established under NRS 383.170, is comprised of individuals with expertise in history, archaeology, architecture, and other relevant fields. The board’s role is to advise on matters of historic preservation, including the approval of nominations. Once a property is listed on the State Register, it receives a measure of protection against adverse effects from state or local government undertakings, as stipulated by NRS 383.175. This protection mechanism is a key component of Nevada’s cultural heritage law, ensuring that significant historical sites are identified and considered in development projects. The law also addresses the management of state-owned historic properties and the archaeological survey of state lands. The authority to establish criteria for the State Register and to approve nominations rests with the State Historic Preservation Board, following recommendations from the State Historic Preservation Officer.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the process for the designation of historic sites. This statute requires that any person proposing to undertake a project that may affect a historic site must notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Nevada State Museum. The notification process is crucial for ensuring that potential impacts to cultural resources are identified and mitigated. The statute does not mandate a specific waiting period before a project can commence after notification, nor does it automatically halt all projects upon notification. Instead, it establishes a procedural requirement for consultation and review. The role of the State Historic Preservation Officer is to advise on the significance of the site and potential impacts, facilitating a process that balances development with preservation. The question probes the understanding of the procedural requirements upon discovering a potential historic site during a construction project in Nevada, focusing on the immediate legal obligation. The correct response reflects the statutory requirement to notify the SHPO and the Nevada State Museum, as stipulated in NRS 383.160, to initiate the review process.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the process for the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) to review proposed actions that may affect historic properties. This review is triggered when a state agency or political subdivision proposes an undertaking that could impact a property listed on or eligible for the Nevada State Register of Historic Places or the National Register of Historic Places. The statute mandates that the agency or political subdivision must notify the SHPO and provide sufficient information for the SHPO to assess the potential impact. The SHPO then has a specified period, typically 30 days, to review the proposal and provide comments. If the SHPO determines that the undertaking will have an adverse effect, the agency must consult with the SHPO to explore alternatives or mitigation measures to minimize or avoid the adverse effect. This process is fundamental to ensuring that development in Nevada considers and protects its cultural heritage, aligning with broader federal preservation principles and Nevada’s commitment to its historical resources. The core of the SHPO’s role in this context is advisory and facilitative, aiming to integrate historic preservation concerns into the planning and execution of public projects.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the process for designating historical markers and the responsibilities associated with them. When a historical marker is proposed for a site that is already part of a designated historic district or property listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) must consult with the governing body of the local jurisdiction where the property is situated. This consultation ensures that the proposed marker is consistent with local preservation plans and ordinances, and does not negatively impact the integrity of the existing historic designation. The SHPO’s role is to provide guidance and ensure compliance with state and federal preservation standards. The ultimate decision to approve or deny the placement of a marker, after consultation, rests with the SHPO, who acts on behalf of the state. Therefore, the SHPO’s approval is a necessary step, but it is contingent upon the consultation process with the local governing body.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.120 through NRS 383.190, governs the protection of archaeological sites and cultural resources. The Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) plays a crucial role in this framework. When a project, particularly one involving state or federal funding or permits, is proposed, a review process is initiated to identify potential impacts on cultural resources. This review often involves consultation with the SHPO and, if necessary, the State Historical Records Advisory Board or other relevant entities. The goal is to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects on significant historical and archaeological sites. If a project is found to have a potential adverse effect, the responsible agency must consult with the SHPO to develop a mitigation plan. This plan could involve various strategies, such as data recovery (excavation), archival research, or public interpretation, depending on the nature and significance of the resource. The process emphasizes collaboration and the balancing of development needs with the imperative to preserve Nevada’s unique cultural heritage. The question tests the understanding of the typical outcome of a consultation process when adverse effects are identified, focusing on the mandated action to develop a mitigation strategy in accordance with state law.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the process for designating and protecting historical landmarks. This statute grants the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) the authority to establish criteria for the nomination of properties to the State Register of Historic Places. The criteria are designed to identify sites that possess significant historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural importance to the state or a community. Once a property is nominated, a review process involving the State Historic Preservation Review Board is initiated. This board evaluates the nomination against the established criteria. If the board approves the nomination, the property is officially listed on the State Register. This designation then triggers specific protections and review requirements under Nevada law, particularly concerning projects that might affect the historical integrity of the designated property. The intent is to ensure that significant cultural resources are identified, documented, and preserved for future generations, balancing development needs with heritage conservation.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically concerning the preservation of historical sites and cultural resources, outlines the framework for managing archaeological and historical properties. When a state agency or political subdivision undertakes a project that might affect a historical or archaeological site, the process generally involves consultation with the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). NRS 383.160 mandates that such agencies must notify the SHPO of proposed undertakings that could impact significant historical or archaeological resources. The SHPO then reviews the proposed undertaking and advises on mitigation measures or alternatives to avoid adverse effects. The law emphasizes a collaborative approach, aiming to balance development with the protection of Nevada’s cultural heritage. This process is crucial for ensuring that projects, whether public or private, do not inadvertently damage or destroy sites of historical or archaeological importance, thereby preserving them for future generations. The consultation process is designed to identify potential impacts early and develop strategies to minimize or eliminate them, adhering to both state and federal preservation principles, often in conjunction with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160 through NRS 383.190, outlines the responsibilities and powers of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concerning the identification, evaluation, and protection of historic properties within Nevada. The core of the SHPO’s mandate involves administering programs established under federal law, such as the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and state-specific initiatives. This includes maintaining the State Register of Historic Places, reviewing proposed undertakings that may affect historic properties, and providing technical assistance to local governments and property owners. The SHPO’s role is crucial in ensuring that development projects consider the cultural and historical significance of Nevada’s heritage. When a state agency or a political subdivision of the state proposes an undertaking that might impact a property listed on the State Register or eligible for such listing, consultation with the SHPO is mandated. This consultation process aims to mitigate adverse effects on historic properties. Failure to consult or to adequately address concerns raised by the SHPO can lead to legal challenges and potential project delays. The SHPO also plays a role in the review of federal undertakings within Nevada that might affect cultural resources, aligning state and federal preservation goals.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160 through NRS 383.190, outlines the process and requirements for identifying, evaluating, and protecting archaeological sites. When a previously undiscovered archaeological site is encountered during construction or land-altering activities on state or private land within Nevada, the project proponent is legally obligated to cease activity in the immediate vicinity of the discovery. This cessation is a temporary measure to allow for proper assessment. Following the cessation of work, the project proponent must notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or their designated representative. The SHPO then initiates a process to determine the significance of the discovered materials under the criteria established in Nevada law and federal guidelines, such as those under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), which often inform state-level decisions. This determination dictates the subsequent steps, which may include further investigation, data recovery, or mitigation measures to minimize adverse impacts. The law emphasizes a collaborative approach between the project proponent, the SHPO, and potentially other stakeholders, including Native American tribes, to ensure that cultural resources are managed responsibly and in accordance with legal mandates. The initial cessation of work is a critical step to prevent inadvertent destruction of potentially significant resources before their nature and importance can be properly assessed by the relevant authorities.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the responsibilities of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concerning the review of proposed undertakings that may affect historic properties. When a federal agency or a permitee proposes an undertaking that could impact a property listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or a property of state or local significance, the SHPO must be consulted. The process involves the agency or permitee providing information about the undertaking and its potential effects. The SHPO then reviews this information and provides comments and recommendations to the agency. This consultation process is a cornerstone of cultural heritage protection, ensuring that potential adverse effects are identified and mitigated. The statute mandates that this review occurs prior to the approval of any permit, license, or other authorization. Therefore, in the scenario described, the SHPO’s role is to conduct a formal review of the proposed highway expansion project’s potential impact on the historic Washoe tribal settlement site. This review is a mandatory step under Nevada law before any permits for construction can be issued, aligning with the protective measures established for cultural resources. The explanation of the calculation involves understanding the statutory requirement for SHPO consultation prior to permit issuance. No numerical calculation is required; the understanding of the legal process is paramount.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383 outlines the protection of archaeological sites and historic properties. Specifically, NRS 383.160 addresses the responsibilities of state agencies and political subdivisions when undertaking or permitting projects that may affect historic properties. The statute mandates that such entities must consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) prior to commencing any activity that could impact a property listed on or eligible for the State Register of Historic Places. This consultation process is designed to identify potential adverse effects and to develop mitigation measures if necessary. The statute also allows for the development of programmatic agreements to streamline this consultation for certain types of undertakings, but the fundamental requirement for consultation with the SHPO remains. The question asks about the initial mandatory step for a county in Nevada when planning a new courthouse construction project that might impact a property on the State Register. The correct procedure involves consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer. Other options are either not the initial mandatory step, are outside the scope of state agency responsibilities under NRS 383, or represent a later stage in the process.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383 governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and cultural resources. Specifically, NRS 383.190 outlines the requirements for permits for archaeological investigations on state lands. Any person or entity wishing to conduct such investigations must obtain a permit from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The process involves submitting a detailed proposal outlining the project’s scope, methodology, qualifications of personnel, and plans for artifact curation and reporting. The SHPO reviews these proposals to ensure they comply with state and federal standards for archaeological research and that the proposed activities will not cause unnecessary damage to cultural resources. Failure to obtain a permit before commencing work on state lands can result in penalties, including fines and potential legal action, as stipulated in NRS 383.195. The purpose of this permitting system is to ensure that all archaeological work in Nevada is conducted responsibly and contributes to the scientific understanding of the state’s heritage while safeguarding it for future generations. This includes careful consideration of potential impacts on both surface and subsurface cultural materials, as well as associated environmental contexts. The SHPO’s role is central to this oversight, acting as the primary authority for approving and monitoring such activities to uphold the integrity of Nevada’s archaeological record.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, concerning the protection and preservation of archaeological and historical sites, outlines the framework for managing cultural resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.160 addresses the requirements for permits for archaeological investigations on state lands. This statute mandates that any person conducting archaeological investigations on lands owned or controlled by the state must obtain a permit from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The purpose of this permit system is to ensure that archaeological work is conducted in a professional manner, that findings are properly documented and reported, and that cultural resources are not inadvertently damaged or disturbed without proper authorization. Without such a permit, any excavation or disturbance of potential archaeological sites on state-owned land would be a violation of Nevada law, subject to penalties. Therefore, when a private developer discovers what appears to be an ancient Paiute burial site during a preliminary survey on land designated as state trust land in Nye County, the immediate legal obligation under Nevada law is to cease all activities and report the discovery to the appropriate state authorities, primarily the SHPO, to initiate the process for obtaining the necessary permits for any further investigation or mitigation.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, concerning the protection and preservation of historical and cultural resources, outlines specific procedures and responsibilities for state agencies and local governments. When a state agency proposes an undertaking that may affect historic properties, it is mandated to consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). This consultation process is a cornerstone of cultural heritage law, aiming to identify potential impacts and develop mitigation strategies. The SHPO, acting as the primary state official for historic preservation, provides guidance and expertise. The statute emphasizes a collaborative approach, often involving public notice and opportunities for comment from interested parties, including tribal governments when appropriate, to ensure that decisions regarding historic properties are informed and considerate of their significance. The core principle is to avoid or minimize adverse effects on properties listed or eligible for listing in the Nevada State Register of Historic Places or the National Register of Historic Places.

The Nevada Historical Preservation Act, specifically NRS 383.170, outlines the process for state agencies to consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) when an undertaking may affect historic properties. The law mandates that agencies must identify and evaluate historic properties and, if an undertaking will adversely affect a historic property, the agency must take all prudent means to minimize the adverse effect. This consultation process is critical for ensuring compliance with federal laws like Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, which Nevada’s state laws often mirror and implement. The core of the agency’s responsibility is to proactively engage with the SHPO to identify potential impacts and develop mitigation strategies. This involves more than just notification; it requires a collaborative effort to balance development needs with the preservation of Nevada’s unique cultural resources. The concept of “prudent means” implies a reasonable and feasible approach to avoidance or mitigation, considering the project’s scope and available resources.

The scenario presented involves the discovery of potentially significant cultural artifacts during a construction project in Nevada. The core legal question revolves around the proper notification and handling procedures mandated by Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 278, specifically concerning the protection of cultural resources. NRS 278.028 requires that if an applicant for a permit or approval discovers evidence of a historical or archaeological site, the applicant must immediately cease work in the vicinity of the discovery and notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or a designated tribal representative. The law also stipulates that work shall not resume until the SHPO or designated representative has authorized its continuation. In this case, the discovery of what appear to be Paiute artifacts triggers these notification requirements. The failure to immediately cease work and notify the SHPO, as stipulated in NRS 278.028, constitutes a violation of Nevada law. The subsequent continuation of excavation without proper notification and authorization directly contravenes the protective measures established to safeguard cultural heritage. Therefore, the primary legal consequence for the construction company is the violation of the notification and cessation of work provisions outlined in NRS 278.028. This violation can lead to penalties, including fines and work stoppages, and necessitates an immediate halt to all excavation until the SHPO has assessed the site and provided further guidance. The question tests the understanding of the procedural obligations triggered by the discovery of cultural materials under Nevada law, emphasizing the immediate duty to report and pause operations.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, particularly NRS 383.160, outlines the responsibilities of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concerning the identification, evaluation, and protection of cultural resources. When a proposed undertaking by a state agency or a political subdivision of Nevada may affect a property listed or eligible for listing on the Nevada State Register of Historic Places, the agency or subdivision must consult with the SHPO. This consultation process is designed to determine the nature of the potential adverse effect and to explore alternatives or mitigation measures to minimize or avoid such effects. The statute emphasizes a collaborative approach between the undertaking entity and the SHPO to ensure that Nevada’s cultural heritage is preserved. Failure to consult appropriately can lead to violations of state law. The question tests the understanding of the procedural requirements when a state-level undertaking might impact a state-registered historic property, focusing on the mandatory consultation with the SHPO as the primary step.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383 governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and historical resources within the state. Specifically, NRS 383.161 outlines the process for reporting the discovery of archaeological or historical sites or artifacts. This statute mandates that any person who discovers or knows of the existence of any archaeological or historical site or artifact on public lands or on land owned by the state or any political subdivision thereof, or on land not owned by a private individual, must report the discovery to the State Historic Preservation Officer or the Director of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources within a specified timeframe. The intent is to ensure that such discoveries are documented and managed according to state law, preventing unauthorized disturbance or removal. Failure to report such discoveries can result in penalties. The statute also emphasizes the importance of consulting with appropriate authorities before undertaking any action that might affect a discovered resource. This proactive reporting mechanism is crucial for the comprehensive management and protection of Nevada’s rich cultural heritage, encompassing Native American sites, pioneer settlements, and other historically significant locations. The law aims to balance development and resource use with the imperative to safeguard these irreplaceable assets for future generations.

The Nevada Historic Preservation Act, codified primarily within Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, outlines the framework for identifying, evaluating, and protecting historic properties within the state. A key component of this act is the designation of historic districts and individual landmarks. When considering the process for designating a property as a State Historic Landmark, the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) plays a central role. The SHPO is responsible for administering the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 within Nevada, as well as state-level preservation programs. The designation process typically involves nomination, review by the State Historic Preservation Officer, and ultimately, approval by the Nevada Board of Museums and History. The criteria for designation are based on significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. The question focuses on the administrative body responsible for the final official recognition of a State Historic Landmark, which is the Nevada Board of Museums and History, following the SHPO’s recommendation.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160, outlines the process for identifying and nominating sites for the Nevada State Register of Historic Places. This statute mandates that nominations must be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The SHPO then reviews the nomination for completeness and adherence to established criteria, which are typically based on significance in history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. Following the SHPO’s review, the nomination is presented to the Nevada State Historic Preservation Review Board for consideration. This board, comprised of individuals with expertise in historic preservation, archaeology, history, and architecture, makes the final recommendation on whether to list a site on the State Register. The process emphasizes a thorough evaluation of a property’s integrity and its association with significant historical events or persons. Therefore, a nomination must first be submitted to the SHPO for an initial assessment before it can be formally considered for listing by the review board.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, concerning the preservation of historical sites and artifacts, outlines specific procedures for dealing with discoveries made during construction or development projects. Specifically, NRS 383.150 mandates that any person who unearths or discovers any artifact or object of historical or archaeological significance during excavation or construction must immediately cease work in the immediate vicinity and report the discovery to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The law further specifies that the SHPO then has a period of 72 hours from notification to investigate the discovery. If the SHPO determines that the discovery is of historical or archaeological significance, they can then take steps to protect the site, which may include further investigation, salvage, or preservation measures. Failure to report such a discovery or to cease work as directed can result in penalties. Therefore, in this scenario, the developer must report the discovery to the SHPO, who then has 72 hours to assess the situation. The subsequent actions depend on the SHPO’s determination of significance.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.120, outlines the process for designating historical markers. This statute empowers the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) to approve applications for historical markers. The criteria for approval are generally based on the significance of the site or structure, its association with important historical events or persons, and its integrity. The process typically involves a formal application submitted to the SHPO, a review by the State Historic Preservation Office staff, and a final decision by the SHPO. There is no direct statutory requirement for a public hearing or a vote by the Nevada State Legislature for the approval of historical markers; these are administrative designations. The State Historic Preservation Office is the primary administrative body responsible for managing the historical marker program in Nevada, ensuring that designations align with state preservation goals and standards. The SHPO’s role is crucial in maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the state’s historical marker system, which serves to educate the public and commemorate significant aspects of Nevada’s past.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically NRS 383.160 through NRS 383.190, outlines the responsibilities and authorities of the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concerning the identification, evaluation, and protection of cultural resources within the state. A key aspect of this framework is the process for reviewing proposed undertakings that may affect historic properties. When a federal or state agency proposes an undertaking that could impact a property listed or eligible for listing on the Nevada State Register of Historic Places or the National Register of Historic Places, a consultation process is initiated. This process, often referred to as Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) for federal undertakings, or similar state-level reviews for state undertakings, requires the agency to identify potential impacts and consult with the SHPO. The SHPO’s role is to provide expertise, review findings, and advise on mitigation measures. If an agency fails to adequately consult or if disagreements arise regarding the eligibility of a property or the significance of potential impacts, the Governor of Nevada may be called upon to resolve the dispute, as stipulated in the statutes. This ensures a hierarchical approach to resolving conflicts and upholding the state’s commitment to historic preservation.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 383, specifically concerning the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office and cultural resources, outlines the framework for protecting archaeological and historical sites. The Nevada Antiquities Act, while not a separate chapter, is embedded within this framework, emphasizing the state’s authority to manage and protect its cultural heritage. When a proposed development project, such as the construction of a new resort near historic mining settlements in Nye County, Nevada, has the potential to impact cultural resources, a systematic process is triggered. This process involves consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and adherence to state and federal guidelines. The core principle is to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects on significant cultural properties. Mitigation can involve various measures, including data recovery (archaeological excavation), stabilization, or documentation. The determination of what constitutes an “adverse effect” under Nevada law is crucial and often involves assessing whether a project will alter, directly or indirectly, the character that qualifies a historic property for inclusion in the State Register of Historic Places or the National Register of Historic Places. The SHPO plays a pivotal role in this determination and in developing appropriate mitigation strategies. If a project is deemed to have an adverse effect, the developer must work collaboratively with the SHPO to implement measures that preserve the integrity of the cultural resource, or at least its significant information content. This collaborative process is designed to balance development needs with the imperative of preserving Nevada’s unique historical and archaeological legacy.