Donoghue v. Stevenson
[1932] AC 562
A person must take reasonable care to avoid acts likely to injure closely and directly affected neighbors.
Draft subject workspace
Torts
Practice Torts exam questions covering core doctrines, issue spotting, applied analysis, and exam-ready explanations.
Overview Draft
This page is scaffolded for a 2,000+ word SEO overview, curated cases, a master outline, a glossary, flashcards, and a practice quiz. All generated legal content remains in draft status until a human reviewer verifies sources and citations.
The paid product path for Torts centers on unlimited practice questions, essay issue spotters, performance analytics, and adaptive drills that recommend the next study session from missed subtopics.
Curated Case Brief Queue
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
248 N.Y. 339 (1928)
Negligence liability requires a duty to the plaintiff based on foreseeable risk.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
217 N.Y. 382 (1916)
Manufacturers can owe negligence duties to foreseeable users of dangerous products.
Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman
[1990] 2 AC 605
The Caparo test asks foreseeability, proximity, and fairness for novel duty situations.
Rylands v. Fletcher
(1868) LR 3 HL 330
Strict liability may apply for escape of dangerous things from non-natural land use.