Exxon Mobil Global Services v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, and Keneshia Washington in Her Official Capacity as Administrative Law Judge [2025]
15-24-00034-CV · Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · Jurisdiction from source
Issue
What are the procedural requirements for perfecting an appeal from a State Office of Administrative Hearings decision in Texas?
Held
The source excerpt does not reveal any holding; it is merely a docket entry showing acceptance of the case. This is a source-linked holding checkpoint; the candidate should confirm the full judgment from the subsequent opinion.
Exam use
Summary
What are the procedural requirements for perfecting an appeal from a State Office of Administrative Hearings decision in Texas?
Facts
Issue
What are the procedural requirements for perfecting an appeal from a State Office of Administrative Hearings decision in Texas?
Held
The source excerpt does not reveal any holding; it is merely a docket entry showing acceptance of the case. This is a source-linked holding checkpoint; the candidate should confirm the full judgment from the subsequent opinion.
Ratio Decidendi
The source record does not provide a legal rule. It serves as a procedural checkpoint, reminding students that administrative appeals must be timely filed and accepted by the appellate court.
Reasoning
Essay-Ready Explanation Generator
Version 1 of 4
Reference to Exxon Mobil Global Services v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, and Keneshia Washington in Her Official Capacity as Administrative Law Judge (15-24-00034-CV) strengthens a Administrative Law answer because the case reflects the principle that The source record does not provide a legal rule. It serves as a procedural checkpoint, reminding students that administrative appeals must be timely filed and accepted by the appellate court. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as What are the procedural requirements for perfecting an appeal from a State Office of Administrative Hearings decision in Texas? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.
Underlying Concepts
- Appellate procedure
- Administrative appeal process
Significance
Related Cases
No related cases listed.
Exam Tips
Revision Checklist
- Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
- State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
- Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
- Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.