Ashcroft v. Iqbal [2009]

556 U.S. 662 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

civil procedurecivil procedureconstitutional law

Issue

How should courts apply plausibility pleading to discrimination claims?

Held

The complaint did not plausibly plead purposeful discrimination by the named officials.

Exam use

Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.

Summary

Companion to Twombly and central motion-to-dismiss precedent.

Facts

A detainee alleged senior officials adopted discriminatory detention policies after September 11.

Issue

How should courts apply plausibility pleading to discrimination claims?

Held

The complaint did not plausibly plead purposeful discrimination by the named officials.

Ratio Decidendi

Plausibility pleading applies across civil actions under the Federal Rules.

Reasoning

Courts disregard legal conclusions and test remaining factual allegations for plausibility.

Essay-Ready Explanation Generator

Version 1 of 4

Reference to Ashcroft v. Iqbal (556 U.S. 662 (2009)) strengthens a civil procedure answer because the case reflects the principle that Plausibility pleading applies across civil actions under the Federal Rules. Applied to a problem question, the case should be used after identifying the issue as How should courts apply plausibility pleading to discrimination claims? The stronger essay move is to connect the material facts to the court's holding, then explain whether the present facts support the same conclusion or justify distinguishing the authority.

Significance

Companion to Twombly and central motion-to-dismiss precedent.

Related Cases

No related cases listed.

Exam Tips

Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.

Revision Checklist

  • Name the issue before discussing facts so the marker sees the legal question immediately.
  • State the holding in one sentence, then use the ratio to explain why the court reached that result.
  • Use the citation and jurisdiction to show why this authority matters for the problem you are answering.
  • Pair this case with one supporting or contrasting authority if the question tests limits, policy, or exceptions.

Sources