Roe v. Wade [1973]
410 U.S. 113 (1973) · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
Summary
Essential historical precedent for substantive due process and reproductive rights debates.
Facts
A Texas abortion restriction was challenged under constitutional privacy principles.
Issue
Did the Constitution protect a right to choose abortion under the Due Process Clause?
Held
The Court recognized such a right; the holding was later overruled by Dobbs.
Ratio Decidendi
Roe is no longer controlling federal constitutional law after Dobbs.
Reasoning
The majority treated abortion choice as part of personal liberty and privacy, subject to state interests.
Significance
Essential historical precedent for substantive due process and reproductive rights debates.
Related Cases
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization597 U.S. 215 (2022)
Exam Tips
Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.