Terry v. Ohio [1968]

392 U.S. 1 (1968) · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

Summary

Foundational stop-and-frisk doctrine.

Facts

An officer stopped and frisked men he suspected were preparing a robbery.

Issue

Can police conduct a brief stop and frisk on less than probable cause?

Held

Yes, if supported by reasonable suspicion and limited to officer safety.

Ratio Decidendi

A Terry stop requires reasonable suspicion; a frisk requires reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous.

Reasoning

The intrusion was limited and balanced against legitimate safety and crime-prevention interests.

Significance

Foundational stop-and-frisk doctrine.

Related Cases

No related cases listed.

Exam Tips

Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.

Sources