Terry v. Ohio [1968]
392 U.S. 1 (1968) · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
Summary
Foundational stop-and-frisk doctrine.
Facts
An officer stopped and frisked men he suspected were preparing a robbery.
Issue
Can police conduct a brief stop and frisk on less than probable cause?
Held
Yes, if supported by reasonable suspicion and limited to officer safety.
Ratio Decidendi
A Terry stop requires reasonable suspicion; a frisk requires reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous.
Reasoning
The intrusion was limited and balanced against legitimate safety and crime-prevention interests.
Significance
Foundational stop-and-frisk doctrine.
Related Cases
No related cases listed.
Exam Tips
Review the ratio and reasoning before applying this case in problem questions.